WEAT ranks 2nd and USG 5th of 13 funds in the Commodity Futures Category.
USG vs WEAT
USG −0.17pt a year
0.45%0.62%
WEAT 127.2×the volume
4.23K538K
USG +27.2pt
+19.4%−7.8%
USG vs WEAT Performance
−6.4%+4.7%
- USG 0.45%, better
- WEAT 0.62%
- USG $9M
- WEAT $234M
- USG −6.4%
- WEAT +4.7%, better
- USG 32.00%
- WEAT
- USG 3
- WEAT 31
- USG 4.23K sh
- WEAT 538K sh, better
- USG $29.84
- WEAT $22.21
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | USG | WEAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A99Higher | A76 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D32Higher | D26 |
| Tradability | D27 | A84Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D39 | B61Higher |
Rank among Commodity Futures funds
Same Category. USG and WEAT are both graded against the same 13 Commodity Futures funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
USGB
WEATB
In short
USG Gold with a paycheck attached. USG holds claims on real gold bars plus collateralized futures, sells call options against that gold, and distributes quarterly, at one of the lowest fees in the commodity-futures crowd.
WEAT Wheat, straight up. Since 2011 this Teucrium fund has given brokerage-account investors pure-play exposure to CBOT wheat futures, laddered across three contract months rather than piled into the front month.
Stated mandate
USG The Fund seeks long-term results that generally correspond to gold-price performance while generating dividend income from selling gold call options and collateral interest. It obtains gold exposure through gold warrants, collateralized futures, and related derivatives.
WEAT The fund seeks cost-effective price exposure to the wheat market through futures for future delivery.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
USG vs WEAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
USG vs WEAT Cost
Overpaying WEAT vs USG
$3,138
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
USG 0.45%
$9,041
WEAT 0.62%
$12,179
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | USG | WEAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $1,111 | $299 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $4,246 | $1,118 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $12,179 | $3,138 |
- 0.45%USG, cheaper
- 0.62%WEAT
- Middle half of Commodity Futures funds
- Median 0.79%
USG cheapest of 13 funds
WEAT 4th cheapest of 13 funds
USG vs WEAT Dividends
- USG 32.00%
- WEAT
- USG $9.52
- WEAT None
- USG $0.17
- WEAT
- USG Sep 21, 2026
- WEAT
- USG Sep 23, 2026
- WEAT
- USG Quarterly
- WEAT
Distribution history
USG vs WEAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- USG 17.1%, betterWEAT 22.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- USG 0.87, betterWEAT −0.46
- Worst fall
- USG −28.8%WEAT −67.8%
- Market sensitivity
- USG 0.28WEAT 0.68
USG and WEAT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.63%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.62% · 0.65%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


