PSMR ranks 3rd and PDEC 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.
PDEC vs PSMR
PSMR −0.30pt a year
0.79%0.49%
PDEC 17.4×the volume
21.9K1.26K
PDEC +1.4pt
+14.2%+12.8%
PDEC vs PSMR Performance
+10.7%+12.1%
- PDEC 0.79%
- PSMR 0.49%, better
- PDEC $977M
- PSMR $91M
- PDEC +10.7%
- PSMR +12.1%, better
- PDEC 3
- PSMR 3
- PDEC 21.9K sh, better
- PSMR 1.26K sh
- PDEC $47.12
- PSMR $33.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PDEC | PSMR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D35 | A70Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C54 | B57Higher |
| Tradability | B57Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A78Higher | B64 |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
Same Category. PDEC and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PDECC
PSMRB
In short
PDEC The December door into Innovator's buffer lineup: it tracks SPY up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses. Running since 2019, it resets each December 1 and can be held indefinitely.
PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.
Stated mandate
PDEC The Fund seeks to track SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and buffer investors against an initial portion of losses over the outcome period, before fees and expenses.
PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PDEC vs PSMR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PDEC vs PSMR Cost
Overpaying PDEC vs PSMR
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PDEC 0.79%
$15,174
PSMR 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PDEC | PSMR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $883 | $522 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $3,394 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $9,792 | $5,382 |
- 0.79%PDEC
- 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
- Median 0.79%
PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds
PDEC 24th cheapest of 51 funds
PDEC vs PSMR Dividends
- PDEC None
- PSMR None
Distribution history
PDEC vs PSMR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PDEC 7.0%PSMR 6.0%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PDEC 1.31PSMR 1.31Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- PDEC −11.5%, betterPSMR −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PDEC 0.52PSMR 0.45
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.