Skip to content

PDEC vs PSMR

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PDECCCboe

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

PSMRBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSMR −0.30pt a year

PDEC0.79%PSMR0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PDEC 17.4×the volume

PDEC21.9KPSMR1.26K

3Y return · a year

PDEC +1.4pt

PDEC+14.2%PSMR+12.8%

PDEC vs PSMR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.7%PDEC+12.1%PSMR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PDEC +10.7%. PSMR +12.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%7.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PDEC 0.79%
PSMR 0.49%, better
Fund size
PDEC $977M
PSMR $91M
1Y total return
PDEC +10.7%
PSMR +12.1%, better
Holdings
PDEC 3
PSMR 3
Avg volume (30D)
PDEC 21.9K sh, better
PSMR 1.26K sh
NAV per share
PDEC $47.12
PSMR $33.00
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PDEC: Cost 35, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 78. PSMR: Cost 70, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings not scored, Durability 64.
Pillar letters and Scores for PDEC, PSMR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPDECPSMR
Cost30% weightD35A70Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC54B57Higher
Tradability15% weightB57HigherD32
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA78HigherB64

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PDEC and PSMR are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

PSMR ranks 3rd and PDEC 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48
  6. Rank 16CPDECInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47
  7. Rank 16CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PDECCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PSMRBPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

In short

PDEC The December door into Innovator's buffer lineup: it tracks SPY up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses. Running since 2019, it resets each December 1 and can be held indefinitely.

PSMR A 15-point cushion on SPY, reset every April, for 0.49% a year while the typical buffer fund charges more. Pacer and Swan's moderate tier trades away some upside (a cap set each period) for a floor you know going in.

Stated mandate

PDEC The Fund seeks to track SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and buffer investors against an initial portion of losses over the outcome period, before fees and expenses.

PSMR The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a predetermined cap while providing a downside buffer over an approximately one-year period.

Why people hold it

  • PDEC The cushion is thick: the first 15% of SPY's losses over the outcome period are absorbed before fees. Past that, losses land one for one.sec.gov
  • Set-and-reset mechanics. The cap and 15% buffer refresh at the start of each December outcome period, and shares can be held straight through the rollover.innovatoretfs.com
  • Innovator launched the first defined-outcome buffer ETFs, and this December vintage dates to 2019. It sits among the stronger builds in its buffer peer group.innovatoretfs.com
  • PSMR Charges 0.49% a year against a 0.79% median in its buffered-SPY cohort, and undercuts Pacer's own single-month siblings like PJUL and POCT at 0.79%.
  • The contract is spelled out: a 15-point buffer against SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust losses over roughly a one-year period, with upside capped at a level set when the period begins.paceretfs.com
  • Terms reset on April 1 each year, so the new buffer and cap arrive on a known calendar date instead of whenever you happened to buy in.paceretfs.com
  • Running since 2021, so this April series has cycled through several complete outcome periods rather than being a fresh launch with a paper track record.

Worth knowing

  • PDEC The cap is the rent you pay for the cushion. Upside above it is left on the table, and each December's cap is set by option pricing at the time.innovatoretfs.com
  • Buy mid-period and your cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms. Shares also trade lightly, so the spread deserves a look.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it sits right at the buffer-category median, and laddered rivals like PSFF (0.10%) and BUFP (0.50%) run cheaper.
  • PSMR Thinly traded next to the biggest names in buffer land, so spreads and order size are worth a look before you place a trade.
  • The cap cuts both ways: big SPY years get trimmed, and the stated buffer and cap only line up in full for a holder who rides one April reset to the next.
  • Not an income vehicle. It has not been paying a regular distribution, so whatever the strategy delivers shows up in the share price.

Full PDEC profile⁠

Full PSMR profile⁠

PDEC vs PSMR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PDEC vs PSMR Cost

Overpaying PDEC vs PSMR

$5,382

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PDEC 0.79%

    $15,174

  • PSMR 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PDEC 0.79%
  • PSMR 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PDEC $15,174PSMR $9,792

Year by year

YearPDECPSMROverpaying
10$1,405$883$522
20$5,331$3,394$1,937
30$15,174$9,792$5,382

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%PDEC
  • 0.49%PSMR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PSMR 5th cheapest of 51 funds

PDEC 24th cheapest of 51 funds

PDEC vs PSMR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PDEC None
PSMR None

Distribution history

PDECAll PDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSMRAll PSMR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PDEC vs PSMR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PDEC 7.0%PSMR 6.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PDEC 1.31PSMR 1.31Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PDEC −11.5%, betterPSMR −11.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PDEC 0.52PSMR 0.45

Popular comparisons

  • PDECCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PDECCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsPSMJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PDECCvsBUFCB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSMRBvsBUFCB

    Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF · AB Conservative Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.