Skip to content

BUFC vs PDEC

AB Conservative Buffer ETF

BUFCBNasdaq

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

PDECCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BUFC −0.10pt a year

BUFC0.69%PDEC0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

BUFC 2.3×the volume

BUFC49.5KPDEC21.9K

BUFC vs PDEC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.8%BUFC+10.7%PDEC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BUFC +5.8%. PDEC +10.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%7.5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BUFC 0.69%, better
PDEC 0.79%
Fund size
BUFC $1.11B
PDEC $977M
1Y total return
BUFC +5.8%
PDEC +10.7%, better
Holdings
BUFC 4
PDEC 3
Avg volume (30D)
BUFC 49.5K sh, better
PDEC 21.9K sh
NAV per share
BUFC $43.25
PDEC $47.12
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BUFC: Cost 57, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings not scored, Durability 74. PDEC: Cost 35, Risk 54, Mission not scored, Tradability 57, Holdings not scored, Durability 78.
Pillar letters and Scores for BUFC, PDEC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBUFCPDEC
Cost30% weightB57HigherD35
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC41C54Higher
Tradability15% weightB62HigherB57
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA74A78Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BUFC and PDEC are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 51 funds
See all 51 ›

BUFC ranks 4th and PDEC 16th of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPSMOPacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETFScore 64
  2. Rank 2BPSMJPacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETFScore 59
  3. Rank 3BPSMRPacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4BBUFCAB Conservative Buffer ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 4CPOCTInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 14CPMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - MayScore 48
  7. Rank 16CPDECInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47
  8. Rank 16CPFEBInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETFScore 47

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BUFCBAB Conservative Buffer ETF

PDECCInnovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF

In short

BUFC Most buffer funds lock you into a 12-month outcome period. BUFC resets every three months, targeting 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 with roughly 3% of the upside per period. Deep cushion, short leash.

PDEC The December door into Innovator's buffer lineup: it tracks SPY up to a preset cap while absorbing the first 15% of losses. Running since 2019, it resets each December 1 and can be held indefinitely.

Stated mandate

BUFC The Fund is an actively managed equity ETF seeking conservative capital appreciation with potential partial downside protection. It uses options to establish an upside cap and downside protection over rolling three-month periods, targeting 15% downside protection and about 3% upside participation to the S&P 500.

PDEC The Fund seeks to track SPY’s return up to a predetermined cap and buffer investors against an initial portion of losses over the outcome period, before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • BUFC Uses options to target 15% downside protection against the S&P 500 over rolling three-month periods, so the cushion resets four times a year instead of once.alliancebernstein.com
  • At 0.69%, it costs less than Innovator's 0.79% Power Buffer funds (PJUL, PJAN, POCT) and less than the typical fund in its buffer cohort.
  • Actively managed rather than pinned to a calendar index series, running since 2023, and among the stronger implementations in its buffer peer group.
  • PDEC The cushion is thick: the first 15% of SPY's losses over the outcome period are absorbed before fees. Past that, losses land one for one.sec.gov
  • Set-and-reset mechanics. The cap and 15% buffer refresh at the start of each December outcome period, and shares can be held straight through the rollover.innovatoretfs.com
  • Innovator launched the first defined-outcome buffer ETFs, and this December vintage dates to 2019. It sits among the stronger builds in its buffer peer group.innovatoretfs.com

Worth knowing

  • BUFC The price of that deep cushion: upside participation is targeted near 3% per three-month period, so big rallies mostly pass you by.
  • Protection is partial and period-based. Losses past the targeted 15% pass through, and buying mid-period shifts your effective buffer and cap.alliancebernstein.com
  • Thinly traded for its size, so spreads and limit orders deserve attention.
  • PDEC The cap is the rent you pay for the cushion. Upside above it is left on the table, and each December's cap is set by option pricing at the time.innovatoretfs.com
  • Buy mid-period and your cap and remaining buffer differ from the headline terms. Shares also trade lightly, so the spread deserves a look.innovatoretfs.com
  • At 0.79% it sits right at the buffer-category median, and laddered rivals like PSFF (0.10%) and BUFP (0.50%) run cheaper.

Full BUFC profile⁠

Full PDEC profile⁠

BUFC vs PDEC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BUFC vs PDEC Cost

Overpaying PDEC vs BUFC

$1,745

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BUFC 0.69%

    $13,429

  • PDEC 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BUFC 0.69%
  • PDEC 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PDEC $15,174BUFC $13,429

Year by year

YearBUFCPDECOverpaying
10$1,232$1,405$173
20$4,697$5,331$634
30$13,429$15,174$1,745

Expense ratio

  • 0.69%BUFC, cheaper
  • 0.79%PDEC
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

BUFC 17th cheapest of 51 funds

PDEC 24th cheapest of 51 funds

BUFC vs PDEC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BUFC None
PDEC None

Distribution history

BUFCAll BUFC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PDECAll PDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BUFC vs PDEC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BUFC 3.4%since Jan 2024PDEC 7.0%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BUFC 0.82since Jan 2024PDEC 1.31
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BUFC −8.3%since Dec 2023PDEC −11.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BUFC 0.26PDEC 0.52

Popular comparisons

  • BUFCBvsPSMOB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PDECCvsPSMOB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMJB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PDECCvsPSMJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BUFCBvsPSMRB

    AB Conservative Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PDECCvsPSMRB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.