PEMX ranks 4th and WCME 7th of 9 funds in the Emerging Markets Active Growth Category.
PEMX vs WCME
PEMX −0.25pt a year
0.70%0.95%
WCME 7.1×the volume
1.41K9.97K
PEMX vs WCME Performance
+23.2%−0.2%
- PEMX 0.70%, better
- WCME 0.95%
- PEMX $30M
- WCME $36M
- PEMX +23.2%, better
- WCME −0.2%
- PEMX 5.83%, better
- WCME 0.38%
- PEMX 55
- WCME 44
- PEMX 1.41K sh
- WCME 9.97K sh, better
- PEMX $78.33
- WCME $17.42
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEMX | WCME |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B58Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | C52 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | F19 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | C43 | C49Higher |
| Durability | B63 | B65Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
Same Category. PEMX and WCME are both graded against the same 9 Emerging Markets Active Growth funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEMXC
WCMED
In short
PEMX China swamps most emerging-market funds. PEMX cuts it out entirely and runs an active, roughly 60-stock book across the rest of the developing world, priced well below the typical active EM manager.
WCME Emerging markets with conviction: roughly 30 stocks hand-picked by boutique manager WCM, with frontier names in bounds. Built to look nothing like a broad developing-world index fund.
Stated mandate
PEMX The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests primarily in emerging-market common stocks outside China and Hong Kong, using active fundamental research to identify companies with favorable investment potential.
WCME The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies located in developing countries, using WCM’s bottom-up fundamental research process.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEMX vs WCME Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEMX vs WCME Cost
Overpaying WCME vs PEMX
$4,263
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEMX 0.70%
$13,606
WCME 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEMX | WCME | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,250 | $1,678 | $428 |
| 20 | $4,760 | $6,322 | $1,562 |
| 30 | $13,606 | $17,869 | $4,263 |
- 0.70%PEMX, cheaper
- 0.95%WCME
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Active Growth funds
- Median 0.79%
PEMX 4th cheapest of 9 funds
WCME 9th cheapest of 9 funds
PEMX vs WCME Dividends
- PEMX 5.83%, better
- WCME 0.38%
- PEMX $4.50
- WCME $0.07
- PEMX $4.50
- WCME $0.05
- PEMX Dec 19, 2025
- WCME Jun 25, 2026
- PEMX Dec 23, 2025
- WCME Jun 30, 2026
- PEMX Annual
- WCME Twice a year
Distribution history
PEMX vs WCME Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEMX 19.8%WCME 18.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- PEMX 1.21WCME 0.55
- Worst fall
- PEMX −19.0%WCME −15.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PEMX 1.18WCME 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.70% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.64%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.70% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.66%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.