PEPS ranks 21st and TPAY 42nd of 51 funds in the S&P 500 Option Income Category.
PEPS vs TPAY
PEPS −0.39pt a year
0.10%0.49%
TPAY 2.9×the volume
4171.21K
PEPS vs TPAY Performance
−1.2%−2.9%
- PEPS 0.10%, better
- TPAY 0.49%
- PEPS $28M
- TPAY $2M
- PEPS +13.2%
- TPAY
- PEPS 0.98%
- TPAY 6.46%, better
- PEPS 192
- TPAY 4
- PEPS 417 sh
- TPAY 1.21K sh, better
- PEPS $31.53
- TPAY $51.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PEPS | TPAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | B66 |
| Mission | A100 | |
| Risk | D25 | D35Higher |
| Tradability | D33Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | A71Higher | F24 |
| Durability | D39Higher | D30 |
Rank among S&P 500 Option Income funds
Same Category. PEPS and TPAY are both graded against the same 51 S&P 500 Option Income funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PEPSB
TPAYC
In short
PEPS Active management at index-fund pricing. PEPS holds a U.S. large-cap base, then writes S&P 500 calls against offsetting long exposure: a beta-neutral overlay built to add return rather than swap upside for income.
TPAY Most S&P 500 income funds pay out whatever the options market hands them. TPAY works backwards: set the number first (a 10% annualized distribution rate, paid monthly), then run the S&P 500 sleeve to fund it.
Stated mandate
PEPS The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It is actively managed, using a U.S. large-cap equity base and beta-neutral call overwriting on the S&P 500 with offsetting long exposure to seek incremental total return.
TPAY The Fund seeks exposure to the return of the S&P 500® Index while pursuing tax-efficient monthly distributions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PEPS vs TPAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PEPS vs TPAY Cost
Overpaying TPAY vs PEPS
$7,686
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PEPS 0.10%
$2,106
TPAY 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PEPS | TPAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $183 | $883 | $700 |
| 20 | $717 | $3,394 | $2,677 |
| 30 | $2,106 | $9,792 | $7,686 |
- 0.10%PEPS, cheaper
- 0.49%TPAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Option Income funds
- Median 0.60%
PEPS cheapest of 51 funds
TPAY 17th cheapest of 51 funds
PEPS vs TPAY Dividends
- PEPS 0.98%
- TPAY 6.46%, better
- PEPS $0.32
- TPAY $3.37
- PEPS $0.09
- TPAY $0.42
- PEPS Sep 21, 2026
- TPAY Oct 14, 2026
- PEPS Sep 25, 2026
- TPAY Oct 15, 2026
- PEPS Quarterly
- TPAY Monthly
Distribution history
PEPS vs TPAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PEPS 12.9%TPAY
- Return per unit of risk
- PEPS 0.85TPAY
- Worst fall
- PEPS −21.3%TPAY
- Market sensitivity
- PEPS 1.02TPAY 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.10% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.38%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.10% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.