USLN ranks 3rd and PFRL 9th of 11 funds in the Bank Loan Category.
PFRL vs USLN
USLN −0.29pt a year
0.72%0.43%
PFRL 5.6×the volume
18.6K3.33K
PFRL vs USLN Performance
+0.6%+0.8%
- PFRL 0.72%
- USLN 0.43%, better
- PFRL $138M
- USLN $30M
- PFRL +5.0%
- USLN
- PFRL 6.74%
- USLN
- PFRL 422
- USLN 361
- PFRL 18.6K sh, better
- USLN 3.33K sh
- PFRL $49.32
- USLN $49.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PFRL | USLN |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F4 | A84Higher |
| Mission | D31 | |
| Risk | C46 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | B56Higher | F13 |
| Holdings | B57Higher | D28 |
| Durability | C46Higher | D26 |
Rank among Bank Loan funds
Same Category. PFRL and USLN are both graded against the same 11 Bank Loan funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PFRLD
USLNC
In short
PFRL Senior bank loans in ETF form, actively picked by PGIM's credit desk instead of cloned from an index. Coupons float with short-term rates, income lands monthly, and the fee sits right at the category median.
Stated mandate
PFRL The Fund seeks to maximize current income, with capital appreciation as a secondary objective. It primarily invests in senior floating-rate loans.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PFRL vs USLN Holdings
How PFRL and USLN differ
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues.
Level by level
- Country72.7%
Sector
No Sector split for USLN.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PFRLMore in USLN | PFRL | USLN |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | USLN +23.8 points | 66.7% | 90.5% |
| Cayman Islands | PFRL +18.5 points | 18.8% | 0.3% |
| Canada | PFRL +5.0 points | 7.9% | 2.9% |
| United Kingdom | PFRL +2.5 points | 3.3% | 0.8% |
| Netherlands | PFRL +1.1 points | 1.8% | 0.7% |
| Luxembourg | USLN +1.1 points | 0.8% | 1.9% |
| Germany | USLN +0.8 points | 0.0% | 0.8% |
| Bermuda | USLN +0.7 points | 0.0% | 0.7% |
| Other countries (5) | USLN +0.7 points | 0.7% | 1.4% |
Concentration
- PFRL17.8%
- USLN21.1%
- PFRL410
- USLN359
Asset class
- PFRL
- Fixed Income
- USLN
- Fixed Income
Holdings
Two bond funds rarely hold the same issues, so this page lists no shared Holdings. PFRL holds 410 securities, USLN 359.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PFRL vs USLN Cost
Overpaying PFRL vs USLN
$5,295
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PFRL 0.72%
$13,957
USLN 0.43%
$8,662
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PFRL | USLN | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,284 | $776 | $508 |
| 20 | $4,888 | $2,994 | $1,894 |
| 30 | $13,957 | $8,662 | $5,295 |
- 0.72%PFRL
- 0.43%USLN, cheaper
- Middle half of Bank Loan funds
- Median 0.61%
USLN 2nd cheapest of 11 funds
PFRL 11th cheapest of 11 funds
PFRL vs USLN Dividends
- PFRL 6.74%
- USLN
- PFRL $3.31
- USLN
- PFRL $0.24
- USLN $0.29
- PFRL Oct 30, 2026
- USLN Oct 1, 2026
- PFRL Pays Nov 3, 2026
- USLN Oct 6, 2026
- PFRL Monthly
- USLN Monthly
Distribution history
PFRL vs USLN Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PFRL 2.6%USLN
- Return per unit of risk
- PFRL 1.21USLN
- Worst fall
- PFRL −8.8%USLN
- Market sensitivity
- PFRL 0.08USLN 0.14
Popular comparisons
- 0.72% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.57%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.72% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.43% · 0.70%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.