XLE ranks 1st and PIPE 17th of 24 funds in the Energy (Broad) Category.
PIPE vs XLE
XLE −0.67pt a year
0.75%0.08%
XLE 11610.0×the volume
2.73K31.6M
PIPE vs XLE Performance
+26.0%+42.3%
- PIPE 0.75%
- XLE 0.08%, better
- PIPE $60M
- XLE $40.5B
- PIPE +26.0%
- XLE +42.3%, better
- PIPE 4.10%, better
- XLE 2.46%
- PIPE 28
- XLE 23
- PIPE 2.73K sh
- XLE 31.6M sh, better
- PIPE $27.71
- XLE $61.64
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PIPE | XLE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F19 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A72 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | C54 |
| Tradability | C45 | A98Higher |
| Holdings | B69Higher | D37 |
| Durability | D37 | A88Higher |
Rank among Energy (Broad) funds
Same Category. PIPE and XLE are both graded against the same 24 Energy (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PIPEC
XLEA
In short
PIPE Invesco's SteelPath team goes narrow: roughly two dozen pipeline and energy infrastructure names, paid out monthly. This is the toll-booth end of energy rather than the drillers, and it charges accordingly.
XLE The 1998 original and still the default way to trade US energy: XLE holds only the oil, gas and oilfield services names inside the S&P 500, capped-weighted, for 0.08% a year.
Stated mandate
PIPE The Fund seeks total return.
XLE The fund seeks to provide investment results that generally track the price and yield performance of the Energy Select Sector Index before expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PIPE vs XLE Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PIPE vs XLE Cost
Overpaying PIPE vs XLE
$12,793
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PIPE 0.75%
$14,482
XLE 0.08%
$1,689
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PIPE | XLE | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $147 | $1,189 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $575 | $4,503 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $1,689 | $12,793 |
- 0.75%PIPE
- 0.08%XLE, cheaper
- Middle half of Energy (Broad) funds
- Median 0.46%
XLE cheapest of 24 funds
PIPE 19th cheapest of 24 funds
PIPE vs XLE Dividends
- PIPE 4.10%, better
- XLE 2.46%
- PIPE $1.16
- XLE $1.52
- PIPE $0.10
- XLE $0.38
- PIPE Oct 19, 2026
- XLE Sep 21, 2026
- PIPE Oct 23, 2026
- XLE Sep 23, 2026
- PIPE Monthly
- XLE Quarterly
Distribution history
PIPE vs XLE Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PIPE 17.2%XLE 21.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- PIPE 0.92XLE 0.82
- Worst fall
- PIPE −15.7%XLE −26.1%
- Market sensitivity
- PIPE −0.16XLE −0.02
PIPE and XLE in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.37%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





