Skip to content

PQAP vs QTR

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

PQAPBNasdaq

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

QTR −0.25pt a year

PQAP0.50%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

PQAP 3.7×the volume

PQAP6.17KQTR1.67K

PQAP vs QTR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+15.5%PQAP+4.6%QTR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PQAP +15.5%. QTR +4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%0%10%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PQAP 0.50%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
PQAP $32M
QTR $10M
1Y total return
PQAP +15.5%, better
QTR +4.6%
Yield (12M)
PQAP No data
QTR 17.33%
Holdings
PQAP 4
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
PQAP 6.17K sh, better
QTR 1.67K sh
NAV per share
PQAP $32.96
QTR $32.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PQAP: Cost 76, Risk 93, Mission not scored, Tradability 29, Holdings not scored, Durability 49. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 85, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for PQAP, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPQAPQTR
Cost30% weightA76A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA93HigherF14
Tradability15% weightD29D32Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightC49HigherD38

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PQAP and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQAP ranks 1st and QTR 2nd of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PQAPBPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

PQAP A one-year cushion on the Nasdaq-100, with a bit more padding than the category norm: PQAP absorbs the first 12% of a QQQ drop over each period starting April 1, and charges 0.50% to do it.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

PQAP The Fund seeks to match QQQ’s price return up to a predetermined cap while buffering the first 12% of QQQ losses over a one-year target outcome period.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • PQAP The buffer runs 12 percentage points deep, versus the 10% cushion on the Innovator Nasdaq-100 buffer fund (QBUF) sitting in the same peer group.pgim.com
  • 0.50% a year undercuts the typical Nasdaq-100 buffer fund, including QBUF at 0.79%. In a strategy where the option budget sets your cap, fee drag matters.
  • April is one of four start months PGIM runs on this same 12% QQQ recipe (January, April, July, October), so entry points can be staggered instead of bunched.pgim.com
  • Mechanically clean build: FLEX options on QQQ itself, a stated one-year outcome period, and one of the stronger risk profiles among Nasdaq-100 buffer funds.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • PQAP The upside cap is reset for each period and is unknown until it starts. Above it, QQQ's gains keep going without you.pgim.com
  • The 12% buffer is measured before fees and expenses and applies to holders across a full period. Buy mid-period and your own cushion and cap differ from the headline terms.pgim.com
  • Small and lightly traded next to the buffer giants, so spreads can be wider. It also launched in late 2024, giving it a short record.
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full PQAP profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

PQAP vs QTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PQAP vs QTR Cost

Overpaying PQAP vs QTR

$4,820

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PQAP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PQAP 0.50%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530PQAP $9,979QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearPQAPQTROverpaying
10$900$455$445
20$3,460$1,769$1,691
30$9,979$5,159$4,820

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%PQAP
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

PQAP 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

PQAP vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PQAP No data
QTR 17.33%
Payout (12M)
PQAP No data
QTR $5.67
Last payment
PQAP $0.0049
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
PQAP Dec 30, 2025
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
PQAP Jan 2, 2026
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
PQAP Irregular
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

PQAPIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQAP payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0049. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD
QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

PQAP vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PQAP 6.7%since Feb 2025QTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PQAP 1.59since Feb 2025QTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PQAP −10.8%since Jan 2025QTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PQAP 0.43QTR 1.16

PQAP and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PQAPBvsPQJAB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsPQOCB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQAPBvsQBUFC

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April · Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsQBUFC

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.