Skip to content

QBUF vs QTR

Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF

QBUFCNasdaq

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QTR −0.54pt a year

QBUF0.79%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

QBUF 24.3×the volume

QBUF40.5KQTR1.67K

QBUF vs QTR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+3.2%QBUF+4.6%QTR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. QBUF +3.2%. QTR +4.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−10%−5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QBUF 0.79%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
QBUF $199M
QTR $10M
1Y total return
QBUF +3.2%
QTR +4.6%, better
Yield (12M)
QBUF No data
QTR 17.33%
Holdings
QBUF 3
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
QBUF 40.5K sh, better
QTR 1.67K sh
NAV per share
QBUF $30.11
QTR $32.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBUF: Cost 46, Risk 61, Mission 37, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 58. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 85, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBUF, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBUFQTR
Cost30% weightC46A97Higher
Mission25% weightD37Not scored
Risk15% weightB61HigherF14
Tradability15% weightB64HigherD32
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA85
Durability5% weightB58HigherD38

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBUF and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

QTR ranks 2nd and QBUF 5th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61
  5. Rank 5CQBUFInnovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 6CPQJLPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JulyScore 53

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QBUFCInnovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

QBUF Buffer funds usually run on a 12-month clock. QBUF resets every quarter: a 10% downside buffer on the Nasdaq-100 and a fresh upside cap, four times a year.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

QBUF The Fund seeks to replicate the performance of an ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index over quarterly outcome periods, subject to a predefined upside cap and a 10% downside buffer.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • QBUF Quarterly outcome periods. The 10% buffer and a new cap reset four times a year, so a fresh starting line is never more than three months out.
  • The reference asset is the Invesco QQQ Trust itself, not a custom index, so the outcome is keyed to a Nasdaq-100 vehicle you can watch in real time.
  • The 0.79% fee is the median for shallow-buffer Nasdaq-100 funds, and this one sits in the upper half of that peer group overall.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • QBUF Downside protection is paid for with upside. The cap is reset at the start of each quarter from option pricing, so the next period's ceiling isn't known in advance.
  • The 10% buffer runs from the period's start and sits before fees. Buy mid-quarter and your actual cushion and cap differ from the headline terms.
  • Pricier than some cousins: the PGIM Nasdaq-100 buffer series runs 0.50%, QTR 0.25%. It also trades thinly, so limit orders earn their keep.
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full QBUF profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

QBUF vs QTR Holdings

As of

How QBUF and QTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QBUF and 0.0% of QTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Sector10 Sectors98.8%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

Sector weights in QBUF and QTR, widest gap first
SectorMore in QBUFMore in QTR
CommunicationQBUF +0.8 points
IndustrialsQTR +0.6 points
TechnologyQBUF +0.4 points
Health CareQTR +0.3 points
Consumer StaplesQTR +0.2 points
UtilitiesQTR +0.1 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQBUF +0.1 points
EnergySame weight
FinancialsSame weight
MaterialsSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QBUF and QTR, widest gap first
CountryMore in QBUFMore in QTR
United StatesSame weight
CanadaSame weight
NetherlandsSame weight
BrazilSame weight
ChinaSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QBUF102.7%
  • QTR46.7%

Securities held

  • QBUF3
  • QTR104

Asset class

QBUF
Equity
QTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QBUF3
  • In both0
  • Only in QTR104

Only in QBUF

3 securities, 100% of QBUF by weight

  • Qqq 12/31/2026 1.86 C95.31%
  • Qqq 12/31/2026 739.78 P7.28%
  • Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.14%

Only in QTR

104 securities, 99.9% of QTR by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp8.16%
  • Apple Inc7.45%
  • Microsoft Corp6.01%

Weight gaps

QBUF and QTR share no securities.

All 6 QBUF holdings⁠All 103 QTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBUF vs QTR Cost

Overpaying QBUF vs QTR

$10,015

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBUF 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBUF 0.79%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QBUF $15,174QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearQBUFQTROverpaying
10$1,405$455$950
20$5,331$1,769$3,562
30$15,174$5,159$10,015

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%QBUF
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

QBUF 6th cheapest of 12 funds

QBUF vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QBUF No data
QTR 17.33%
Payout (12M)
QBUF None
QTR $5.67
Last payment
QBUF No data
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
QBUF No data
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
QBUF No data
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
QBUF No data
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

QBUFAll QBUF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

QBUF vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QBUF 4.8%since Aug 2024QTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QBUF 0.95since Aug 2024QTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QBUF −8.8%since Jul 2024QTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBUF 0.28QTR 1.16

QBUF and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QBUFCvsPQAPB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQAPB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBUFCvsPQJAB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QBUFCvsPQOCB

    Innovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.