QTR ranks 2nd and PQJL 5th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
PQJL vs QTR
0.0%by weight
QTR −0.25pt a year
0.50%0.25%
PQJL 3.5×the volume
5.67K1.64K
PQJL vs QTR Performance
+1.8%+1.5%
- PQJL 0.50%
- QTR 0.25%, better
- PQJL $28M
- QTR $10M
- PQJL +1.8%, better
- QTR +1.5%
- PQJL
- QTR 18.06%
- PQJL 5
- QTR 104
- PQJL 5.67K sh, better
- QTR 1.64K sh
- PQJL $30.44
- QTR $32.62
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PQJL | QTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C46Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | F19 | D32Higher |
| Holdings | A86 | |
| Durability | C49Higher | D38 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. PQJL and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PQJLC
QTRB
In short
PQJL The July door into PGIM's Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 series: QQQ's price return up to a cap, with the first 12% of QQQ's losses absorbed over a one-year outcome period, for 0.50% a year.
QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.
Stated mandate
PQJL The fund is designed to track QQQ's price return up to an upside cap while absorbing the first 12% of QQQ losses, before fees and expenses, over a one-year target outcome period.
QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PQJL vs QTR Holdings
How PQJL and QTR differ
0.0%
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
| Sector | More in PQJLMore in QTR | Gap | PQJL | QTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | PQJL +0.1 points | 58.0% | 57.9% | |
| Industrials | Same weight | 5.3% | 5.3% | |
| Utilities | Same weight | 1.2% | 1.2% | |
| Communication | Same weight | 11.1% | 11.1% | |
| Consumer Staples | Same weight | 6.8% | 6.8% | |
| Financials | Same weight | 0.2% | 0.2% | |
| Energy | Same weight | 0.5% | 0.5% | |
| Consumer Discretionary | Same weight | 11.0% | 11.0% | |
| Materials | Same weight | 1.1% | 1.1% | |
| Health Care | Same weight | 4.8% | 4.8% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in PQJLMore in QTR | Gap | PQJL | QTR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 97.3% | 97.3% | |
| Canada | Same weight | 1.1% | 1.1% | |
| Netherlands | Same weight | 0.9% | 0.9% | |
| Brazil | Same weight | 0.4% | 0.4% | |
| China | Same weight | 0.2% | 0.2% | |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.2% | 0.2% |
Concentration
- PQJL104.4%
- QTR46.4%
- PQJL3
- QTR103
Asset class
- PQJL
- Alternatives
- QTR
- Stocks
Holdings
- Only in PQJL3
- In both0
- Only in QTR103
Only in PQJL
3 securities, 100% of PQJL by weight
- 4QQQ Us 06/30/27 C7.3695.02%
- 4QQQ Us 06/30/27 P736.48.62%
- Net Current Assets<0.01%
Only in QTR
103 securities, 99.9% of QTR by weight
- Apple Inc8.18%
- NVIDIA Corp7.74%
- Microsoft Corp6.62%
- Amazon.com Inc4.60%
- Micron Technology Inc3.97%
- Advanced Micro Devices3.53%
- Tesla Inc3.24%
- Meta Platforms Inc3.00%
- Walmart Inc2.78%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A2.72%
- Space Exploration Techn-Cl A2.58%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl C2.54%
- Broadcom Inc2.48%
- Costco Wholesale Corp2.05%
- Cisco Systems Inc1.80%
- Palantir Technologies Inc-A1.74%
- Intel Corp1.35%
- Applied Materials Inc1.29%
- Texas Instruments Inc1.25%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc1.25%
- Lam Research Corp1.22%
- Netflix Inc1.22%
- Amgen Inc1.14%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc - A1.09%
- Linde PLC1.06%
- Ndx Us 12/18/26 P266000.96%
- Gilead Sciences Inc0.95%
- Kla Corp0.88%
- Analog Devices Inc0.86%
- Pepsico Inc0.85%
- Shopify Inc - Class A0.81%
- Qualcomm Inc0.80%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.77%
- T-Mobile Us Inc0.75%
- Sandisk Corp0.67%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.62%
- Asml Holding Nv-Ny Reg Shs0.61%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.61%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.56%
- Seagate Technology Holdings0.56%
- Starbucks Corp0.55%
- Automatic Data Processing0.53%
- Western Digital Corp0.51%
- Marriott International -Cl A0.48%
- Moderna Inc0.46%
- Adobe Inc0.43%
- Cintas Corp0.42%
- Intuit Inc0.42%
- Csx Corp0.42%
- Fortinet Inc0.42%
Weight gaps
PQJL and QTR share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PQJL vs QTR Cost
Overpaying PQJL vs QTR
$4,820
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PQJL 0.50%
$9,979
QTR 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PQJL | QTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $455 | $445 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $1,769 | $1,691 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $5,159 | $4,820 |
- 0.50%PQJL
- 0.25%QTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
QTR cheapest of 12 funds
PQJL 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
PQJL vs QTR Dividends
- PQJL
- QTR 18.06%
- PQJL
- QTR $5.67
- PQJL $0.0017
- QTR $0.04
- PQJL Dec 30, 2025
- QTR Jun 29, 2026
- PQJL Jan 2, 2026
- QTR Jul 2, 2026
- PQJL Irregular
- QTR Twice a year
Distribution history
PQJL vs QTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PQJL 9.9%QTR 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PQJL 0.69QTR 0.91
- Worst fall
- PQJL −12.3%QTR −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PQJL 0.64QTR 1.16
PQJL and QTR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
