Skip to content

PQOC vs QMAR

PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

PQOCBNasdaq

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

QMARCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PQOC −0.40pt a year

PQOC0.50%QMAR0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

QMAR 1.2×the volume

PQOC6.77KQMAR7.99K

PQOC vs QMAR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.2%PQOC+16.3%QMAR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PQOC +9.2%. QMAR +16.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PQOC 0.50%, better
QMAR 0.90%
Fund size
PQOC $29M
QMAR $618M
1Y total return
PQOC +9.2%
QMAR +16.3%, better
Holdings
PQOC 4
QMAR 3
Avg volume (30D)
PQOC 6.77K sh
QMAR 7.99K sh, better
NAV per share
PQOC $31.87
QMAR $37.78
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PQOC: Cost 76, Risk 56, Mission 94, Tradability 42, Holdings not scored, Durability 49. QMAR: Cost 15, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for PQOC, QMAR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPQOCQMAR
Cost30% weightA76HigherF15
Mission25% weightA94Not scored
Risk15% weightB56A70Higher
Tradability15% weightC42A70Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightC49A82Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PQOC and QMAR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

PQOC ranks 4th and QMAR 7th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61
  5. Rank 5CQBUFInnovator Nasdaq-100 10 Buffer ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 6CPQJLPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JulyScore 53
  7. Rank 7CQMARFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  8. Rank 8CQDECFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PQOCBPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

QMARCFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

In short

PQOC Twelve points of downside cushion on the Nasdaq-100, reset every October. PGIM buffers the first 12% of a one-year loss on the big Nasdaq-100 ETF's own shares and caps the upside in exchange, for 0.50% a year.

QMAR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. QMAR absorbs the first 10% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 tracker it references and hands back the upside above a cap reset every March, one of four quarterly entry points in First Trust's buffer lineup.

Stated mandate

PQOC The Fund seeks to track the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 up to a cap while buffering the first 12% of losses during the one-year Target Outcome Period.

QMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 before fees and expenses, subject to a 20.86% upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

Why people hold it

  • PQOC Twelve points of cushion, not ten, and the fee is 0.50% against the 0.79% Innovator charges on its 10-point Nasdaq-100 buffer fund (QBUF).
  • The reference is the shares of the Invesco QQQ Trust itself, not a custom index, so the thing being buffered is the Nasdaq-100 vehicle most investors already watch.
  • One of four PGIM siblings on a quarterly calendar (PQJA starts in January, PQAP in April), so the October reset window is a choice, not a leftover.
  • Priced below the typical shallow-buffer Nasdaq-100 fund, which matters in a structure where fees come straight out of a fixed pool of upside.
  • QMAR The buffer is the whole product: the first 10% of the reference fund's decline is absorbed, before fees, across a defined one-year outcome period that resets each March.ftportfolios.com
  • It references the Invesco QQQ Trust itself rather than a paper index, so the payoff is pinned to the same Nasdaq-100 vehicle most investors already hold.sec.gov
  • Running since 2021, it has now cycled through several complete outcome periods, and its March, June, September and December siblings let you stagger start dates instead of betting on one.

Worth knowing

  • PQOC Upside is capped. A new ceiling gets set at the start of each October outcome period, and any Nasdaq-100 rally past it does not come through.
  • The 12% buffer is designed for the full October-to-September period. Enter or exit mid-stream and you own the options at whatever they are worth that day.
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than on plain Nasdaq-100 funds.
  • QMAR At 0.90% a year it sits at the expensive end of the Nasdaq-100 buffer shelf: QBUF charges 0.79%, PQAP and PQJA 0.50%, QTR 0.25%.
  • The stated cap and buffer apply to buyers who hold a full outcome period. Come in mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and upside room are left, not the headline terms.sec.gov
  • Volume is light next to the biggest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads, and the options structure isn't built to throw off income.

Full PQOC profile⁠

Full QMAR profile⁠

PQOC vs QMAR Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PQOC vs QMAR Cost

Overpaying QMAR vs PQOC

$7,061

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PQOC 0.50%

    $9,979

  • QMAR 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PQOC 0.50%
  • QMAR 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QMAR $17,040PQOC $9,979

Year by year

YearPQOCQMAROverpaying
10$900$1,593$693
20$3,460$6,015$2,555
30$9,979$17,040$7,061

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%PQOC, cheaper
  • 0.90%QMAR
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

PQOC 2nd cheapest of 12 funds

QMAR 9th cheapest of 12 funds

PQOC vs QMAR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PQOC No data
QMAR None
Last payment
PQOC $0.0013
QMAR No data
Ex-dividend
PQOC Dec 30, 2025
QMAR No data
Paid on
PQOC Jan 2, 2026
QMAR No data
Frequency
PQOC Irregular
QMAR No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

PQOCIrregular · 1 paymentAll PQOC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2025 $0.0013. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.0012026YTD
QMARAll QMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PQOC vs QMAR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PQOC 10.5%since Feb 2025QMAR 8.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PQOC 0.79since Feb 2025QMAR 1.33
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PQOC −13.7%since Jan 2025QMAR −19.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PQOC 0.73QMAR 0.55

PQOC and QMAR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PQOCBvsPQAPB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QMARCvsPQAPB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQOCBvsPQJAB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QMARCvsPQJAB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PQOCBvsQTRB

    PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QMARCvsQTRB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March · Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.