PQOC ranks 4th and QMAR 7th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
PQOC vs QMAR
PQOC −0.40pt a year
0.50%0.90%
QMAR 1.2×the volume
6.77K7.99K
PQOC vs QMAR Performance
+9.2%+16.3%
- PQOC 0.50%, better
- QMAR 0.90%
- PQOC $29M
- QMAR $618M
- PQOC +9.2%
- QMAR +16.3%, better
- PQOC 4
- QMAR 3
- PQOC 6.77K sh
- QMAR 7.99K sh, better
- PQOC $31.87
- QMAR $37.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PQOC | QMAR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A76Higher | F15 |
| Mission | A94 | |
| Risk | B56 | A70Higher |
| Tradability | C42 | A70Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | C49 | A82Higher |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. PQOC and QMAR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PQOCB
QMARC
In short
PQOC Twelve points of downside cushion on the Nasdaq-100, reset every October. PGIM buffers the first 12% of a one-year loss on the big Nasdaq-100 ETF's own shares and caps the upside in exchange, for 0.50% a year.
QMAR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. QMAR absorbs the first 10% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 tracker it references and hands back the upside above a cap reset every March, one of four quarterly entry points in First Trust's buffer lineup.
Stated mandate
PQOC The Fund seeks to track the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 up to a cap while buffering the first 12% of losses during the one-year Target Outcome Period.
QMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 before fees and expenses, subject to a 20.86% upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PQOC vs QMAR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PQOC vs QMAR Cost
Overpaying QMAR vs PQOC
$7,061
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PQOC 0.50%
$9,979
QMAR 0.90%
$17,040
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PQOC | QMAR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,593 | $693 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,015 | $2,555 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,040 | $7,061 |
- 0.50%PQOC, cheaper
- 0.90%QMAR
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
PQOC 2nd cheapest of 12 funds
QMAR 9th cheapest of 12 funds
PQOC vs QMAR Dividends
- PQOC
- QMAR None
- PQOC $0.0013
- QMAR
- PQOC Dec 30, 2025
- QMAR
- PQOC Jan 2, 2026
- QMAR
- PQOC Irregular
- QMAR
Distribution history
PQOC vs QMAR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PQOC 10.5%QMAR 8.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- PQOC 0.79QMAR 1.33
- Worst fall
- PQOC −13.7%QMAR −19.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PQOC 0.73QMAR 0.55
PQOC and QMAR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
