Skip to content

QMAR vs QTR

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

QMARCCboe

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

QTR −0.65pt a year

QMAR0.90%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

QMAR 4.8×the volume

QMAR7.99KQTR1.67K

5Y return · a year

QMAR +1.6pt

QMAR+11.0%QTR+9.4%

QMAR vs QTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+68.1%QMAR+56.8%QTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QMAR +68.1%. QTR +56.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QMAR 0.90%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
QMAR $618M
QTR $10M
1Y total return
QMAR +16.3%, better
QTR +4.6%
Yield (12M)
QMAR No data
QTR 17.33%
Holdings
QMAR 3
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
QMAR 7.99K sh, better
QTR 1.67K sh
NAV per share
QMAR $37.78
QTR $32.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QMAR: Cost 15, Risk 70, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 82. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 85, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for QMAR, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQMARQTR
Cost30% weightF15A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA70HigherF14
Tradability15% weightA70HigherD32
Holdings10% weightC53A85Higher
Durability5% weightA82HigherD38

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QMAR and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

QTR ranks 2nd and QMAR 7th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61
  5. Rank 6CPQJLPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JulyScore 53
  6. Rank 7CQMARFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  7. Rank 8CQDECFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QMARCFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

QMAR A one-year seatbelt on the Nasdaq-100. QMAR absorbs the first 10% of losses in the Nasdaq-100 tracker it references and hands back the upside above a cap reset every March, one of four quarterly entry points in First Trust's buffer lineup.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

QMAR The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 before fees and expenses, subject to a 20.86% upside cap, while buffering the first 10% of losses during the March 23, 2026–March 19, 2027 outcome period.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • QMAR The buffer is the whole product: the first 10% of the reference fund's decline is absorbed, before fees, across a defined one-year outcome period that resets each March.ftportfolios.com
  • It references the Invesco QQQ Trust itself rather than a paper index, so the payoff is pinned to the same Nasdaq-100 vehicle most investors already hold.sec.gov
  • Running since 2021, it has now cycled through several complete outcome periods, and its March, June, September and December siblings let you stagger start dates instead of betting on one.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • QMAR At 0.90% a year it sits at the expensive end of the Nasdaq-100 buffer shelf: QBUF charges 0.79%, PQAP and PQJA 0.50%, QTR 0.25%.
  • The stated cap and buffer apply to buyers who hold a full outcome period. Come in mid-period and you inherit whatever cushion and upside room are left, not the headline terms.sec.gov
  • Volume is light next to the biggest buffer funds, which can mean wider spreads, and the options structure isn't built to throw off income.
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full QMAR profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

QMAR vs QTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QMAR vs QTR Cost

Overpaying QMAR vs QTR

$11,881

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QMAR 0.90%

    $17,040

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QMAR 0.90%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QMAR $17,040QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearQMARQTROverpaying
10$1,593$455$1,138
20$6,015$1,769$4,246
30$17,040$5,159$11,881

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%QMAR
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

QMAR 9th cheapest of 12 funds

QMAR vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QMAR No data
QTR 17.33%
Payout (12M)
QMAR None
QTR $5.67
Last payment
QMAR No data
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
QMAR No data
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
QMAR No data
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
QMAR No data
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

QMARAll QMAR payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

QMAR vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QMAR
  • QTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QTR −31.7% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QMAR 8.4%, betterQTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QMAR 1.33, betterQTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QMAR −19.8%, betterQTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QMAR 0.55QTR 1.16

QMAR and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QMARCvsPQAPB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQAPB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QMARCvsPQJAB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QMARCvsPQOCB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.