VYM ranks 2nd and PSC 50th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
PSC vs VYM
VYM −0.34pt a year
0.38%0.04%
VYM 8.8×the volume
131K1.15M
PSC +0.2pt
+11.9%+11.7%
PSC vs VYM Performance
+44.4%+70.4%
- PSC 0.38%
- VYM 0.04%, better
- PSC $2.6B
- VYM $78.9B
- PSC +21.5%, better
- VYM +18.9%
- PSC 0.59%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- PSC 485
- VYM 610
- PSC 131K sh
- VYM 1.15M sh, better
- PSC $66.26
- VYM $159.07
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A81 |
| Risk | D29 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | B61Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B67 | A94Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. PSC and VYM are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSCB
VYMA
In short
PSC Most multi-factor ETFs stack large caps. PSC aims the same momentum, quality and value screens at the small-cap end of the market, spreading across roughly 500 names and measuring itself against the Russell 2000.
VYM The no-frills dividend workhorse. VYM buys the higher-yielding end of the US market, roughly 600 names, for four basis points: no quality screen, no dividend-growth-streak test, just yield, at scale since 2006.
Stated mandate
PSC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
VYM The Fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of common stocks from companies characterized by high dividend yields.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSC vs VYM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSC vs VYM Cost
Overpaying PSC vs VYM
$6,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSC 0.38%
$7,706
VYM 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSC | VYM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $73 | $615 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $288 | $2,370 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $849 | $6,857 |
- 0.38%PSC
- 0.04%VYM, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VYM cheapest of 99 funds
PSC 62nd cheapest of 99 funds
PSC vs VYM Dividends
- PSC 0.59%
- VYM 2.26%, better
- PSC $0.40
- VYM $3.68
- PSC $0.13
- VYM $0.89
- PSC Oct 1, 2026
- VYM Sep 18, 2026
- PSC Oct 5, 2026
- VYM Sep 22, 2026
- PSC Quarterly
- VYM Quarterly
Distribution history
PSC vs VYM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PSC
- VYM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSC 17.1%VYM 11.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PSC 1.00VYM 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- PSC −25.7%VYM −15.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PSC 1.03VYM 0.74
PSC and VYM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


