VONV ranks 1st and PSC 50th of 99 funds in the US Multifactor Category.
PSC vs VONV
VONV −0.32pt a year
0.38%0.06%
VONV 5.9×the volume
131K776K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+11.9%+11.9%
PSC vs VONV Performance
+44.4%+73.9%
- PSC 0.38%
- VONV 0.06%, better
- PSC $2.6B
- VONV $21.7B
- PSC +21.5%
- VONV +30.6%, better
- PSC 0.59%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- PSC 485
- VONV 887
- PSC 131K sh
- VONV 776K sh, better
- PSC $66.26
- VONV $112.88
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSC | VONV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A96Higher |
| Mission | A81 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D29 | A89Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A79Higher | C49 |
| Durability | B67 | A92Higher |
Rank among US Multifactor funds
Same Category. PSC and VONV are both graded against the same 99 US Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSCB
VONVA
In short
PSC Most multi-factor ETFs stack large caps. PSC aims the same momentum, quality and value screens at the small-cap end of the market, spreading across roughly 500 names and measuring itself against the Russell 2000.
VONV The plain-vanilla value trade, done cheap: about 900 large US value stocks, full replication of the Russell 1000 Value Index, 0.06% a year. No factor cocktail, no premium price tag, and one of the strongest implementations in its factor peer group.
Stated mandate
PSC The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
VONV The fund seeks to track the Russell 1000 Value Index, representing large-capitalization value stocks in the United States. It uses passive indexing and full replication to remain closely aligned with that benchmark.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSC vs VONV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSC vs VONV Cost
Overpaying PSC vs VONV
$6,436
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSC 0.38%
$7,706
VONV 0.06%
$1,270
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSC | VONV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $110 | $578 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $432 | $2,226 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $1,270 | $6,436 |
- 0.38%PSC
- 0.06%VONV, cheaper
- Middle half of US Multifactor funds
- Median 0.29%
VONV 4th cheapest of 99 funds
PSC 62nd cheapest of 99 funds
PSC vs VONV Dividends
- PSC 0.59%
- VONV 1.51%, better
- PSC $0.40
- VONV $1.74
- PSC $0.13
- VONV $0.42
- PSC Oct 1, 2026
- VONV Sep 23, 2026
- PSC Oct 5, 2026
- VONV Sep 25, 2026
- PSC Quarterly
- VONV Quarterly
Distribution history
PSC vs VONV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PSC
- VONV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSC 17.1%VONV 12.1%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PSC 1.00VONV 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- PSC −25.7%VONV −18.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PSC 1.03VONV 0.85
PSC and VONV in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.14%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

