UFEB ranks 1st and PSCW 4th of 19 funds in the S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% Category.
PSCW vs UFEB
PSCW −0.30pt a year
0.49%0.79%
UFEB 68.0×the volume
48232.8K
UFEB +0.6pt
+12.8%+13.4%
PSCW vs UFEB Performance
+11.6%+9.7%
- PSCW 0.49%, better
- UFEB 0.79%
- PSCW $62M
- UFEB $167M
- PSCW +11.6%, better
- UFEB +9.7%
- PSCW 3
- UFEB 3
- PSCW 482 sh
- UFEB 32.8K sh, better
- PSCW $30.75
- UFEB $39.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSCW | UFEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | B67 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B57 | B64Higher |
| Tradability | F9 | B63Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D27 | C45Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
Same Category. PSCW and UFEB are both graded against the same 19 S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSCWC
UFEBB
In short
PSCW A 25% cushion against S&P 500 losses for 0.49%, well under the going rate in the deep-buffer aisle. Options do the work: index-like upside to a yearly cap, the first 25% of a decline absorbed, and the whole contract reset every April.
Stated mandate
PSCW The Fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, before fees and expenses, up to a predetermined upside cap while providing a downside risk-mitigation buffer over an approximate one-year period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSCW vs UFEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSCW vs UFEB Cost
Overpaying UFEB vs PSCW
$5,382
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSCW 0.49%
$9,792
UFEB 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSCW | UFEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,405 | $522 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $5,331 | $1,937 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $15,174 | $5,382 |
- 0.49%PSCW, cheaper
- 0.79%UFEB
- Middle half of S&P 500 Deep Buffer 25-30% funds
- Median 0.85%
PSCW 3rd cheapest of 19 funds
UFEB 7th cheapest of 19 funds
PSCW vs UFEB Dividends
- PSCW None
- UFEB None
Distribution history
PSCW vs UFEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSCW 6.1%UFEB 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PSCW 1.29UFEB 1.43, better
- Worst fall
- PSCW −11.9%UFEB −9.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PSCW 0.46UFEB 0.46Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.85%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.