Skip to content

PSFD vs SEPW

Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

PSFDBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF

SEPWCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

PSFD −0.25pt a year

PSFD0.49%SEPW0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

SEPW 51.9×the volume

PSFD905SEPW47K

3Y return · a year

PSFD +4.5pt

PSFD+16.3%SEPW+11.8%

PSFD vs SEPW Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+11.4%PSFD+7.2%SEPW

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PSFD +11.4%. SEPW +7.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSFD 0.49%, better
SEPW 0.74%
Fund size
PSFD $60M
SEPW $213M
1Y total return
PSFD +11.4%, better
SEPW +7.2%
Holdings
PSFD 4
SEPW 3
Avg volume (30D)
PSFD 905 sh
SEPW 47K sh, better
NAV per share
PSFD $40.88
SEPW $34.11
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSFD: Cost 85, Risk 30, Mission not scored, Tradability 45, Holdings not scored, Durability 69. SEPW: Cost 37, Risk 41, Mission not scored, Tradability 83, Holdings 69, Durability 55.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSFD, SEPW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSFDSEPW
Cost30% weightA85HigherD37
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD30C41Higher
Tradability15% weightC45A83Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB69
Durability5% weightB69HigherB55

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSFD and SEPW are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

PSFD ranks 2nd and SEPW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPSFDPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 61
  4. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52
  6. Rank 12CJULWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jul ETFScore 51

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSFDBPacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

SEPWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF

In short

PSFD Absorbs the first 20% of a drop in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over each 12-month period, with your upside capped in exchange. One of the original 2020 Pacer/Swan buffer funds, and priced under most deep-buffer rivals.

SEPW September's door into AllianzIM's deep-buffer series: SEPW absorbs the first 20% of a year's decline in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's share price, and trades away upside above a cap that resets every September 1.

Stated mandate

PSFD The fund seeks to match the returns of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust up to a stated cap while mitigating specified downside losses through a structured buffer strategy over an approximately one-year period.

SEPW The fund seeks to track the share-price return of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust through the current outcome period, subject to an upside cap, while protecting the first 20% of underlying losses. Fees reduce the stated cap and buffer.

Why people hold it

  • PSFD 0.49% a year versus a 0.74% median for 20%-buffer S&P 500 funds, undercutting the AllianzIM month-series lineup (JANW, APRW, JUNW). When upside is capped, fees come straight out of the ceiling.
  • Deep cushion, clean reset: FLEX options are structured to absorb the first 20% of underlying losses over the roughly one-year period, with a new cap struck at the start of each period.paceretfs.com
  • Siblings run the same recipe on other calendars (PSFM in April, PSFJ in July), so start dates can be staggered instead of pinned to one January strike. Standing sits in the upper half of the deep-buffer group.
  • SEPW Deep end of the buffer world: the first 20% of the reference ETF's price decline over a full outcome period is absorbed. Fees reduce the stated buffer and cap.
  • A 1940 Act ETF, not a bank-issued note, so no single issuer's balance sheet sits between the strategy and the payoff.
  • One month in a series: March and May siblings run the same 20% buffer on the same reference, so the start date isn't dictated by a single point on the calendar.

Worth knowing

  • PSFD Thinly traded. Spreads can be wider and larger orders harder to fill than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • No income stream: the fund holds options on an S&P 500 tracker rather than the stocks, and it has not paid a distribution.paceretfs.com
  • Buffer and cap run start to finish of the period and are set before fees and expenses. Shares bought mid-period carry different remaining cushion and headroom.paceretfs.com
  • SEPW Cost sits at the top of the deep-buffer group: 0.74%, against 0.50% at PGIM's laddered PBFR and 0.49% at the Pacer Swan flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM).
  • The reference is a share price, so S&P 500 dividends don't count toward the capped return, and income isn't part of the design.
  • Bought mid-period, the effective buffer and cap differ from the headline terms, which apply across a complete outcome period.

Full PSFD profile⁠

Full SEPW profile⁠

PSFD vs SEPW Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSFD vs SEPW Cost

Overpaying SEPW vs PSFD

$4,515

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSFD 0.49%

    $9,792

  • SEPW 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSFD 0.49%
  • SEPW 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530SEPW $14,307PSFD $9,792

Year by year

YearPSFDSEPWOverpaying
10$883$1,319$436
20$3,394$5,015$1,621
30$9,792$14,307$4,515

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%PSFD, cheaper
  • 0.74%SEPW
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

PSFD cheapest of 24 funds

SEPW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

PSFD vs SEPW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
PSFD None
SEPW None

Distribution history

PSFDAll PSFD payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SEPWAll SEPW payments⁠

No distribution history available.

PSFD vs SEPW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSFD 7.4%SEPW 4.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSFD 1.50, betterSEPW 1.41
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSFD −14.9%SEPW −8.4%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSFD 0.56SEPW 0.39

Popular comparisons

  • PSFDBvsBALTB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsBALTB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFJB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSFDBvsPSFOB

    Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SEPWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.