Skip to content
etf.net

HJUN vs SWAN

Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

HJUNCCboe

Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

SWANBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

HJUN −0.19pt a year

HJUN0.30%SWAN0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

SWAN 8.1×the volume

HJUN1.03KSWAN8.3K

HJUN vs SWAN Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+1.0%HJUN−0.7%SWAN

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. HJUN +1.0%. SWAN −0.7%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%0%2%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
HJUN 0.30%, better
SWAN 0.49%
Fund size
HJUN $3M
SWAN $152M
1Y total return
HJUN No data
SWAN +1.4%
Yield (12M)
HJUN No data
SWAN 3.41%
Holdings
HJUN 4
SWAN 14
Avg volume (30D)
HJUN 1.03K sh
SWAN 8.3K sh, better
NAV per share
HJUN $25.34
SWAN $32.30
52W range

ETF.net Grade

HJUN: Cost 91, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 13. SWAN: Cost 78, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 62, Holdings 54, Durability 79.
Pillar letters and Scores for HJUN, SWAN, with each pillar’s weight
PillarHJUNSWAN
Cost30% weightA91HigherA78
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB60HigherF24
Tradability15% weightF9B62Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC54
Durability5% weightF13A79Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. HJUN and SWAN are both graded against the same 7 S&P 500 Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer⁠

Category · 7 funds
See all 7 ›

SWAN ranks 1st and HJUN 4th of 7 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 1BSWANAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETFScore 60
  2. Rank 2BPSFFPacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETFScore 56
  3. Rank 4CFBProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETFScore 40
  4. Rank 4CHJUNCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40
  5. Rank 6DDHSBDay Hagan Smart Buffer ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

HJUNCCorgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series

SWANBAmplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF

In short

HJUN No data

SWAN The buffer fund that isn't one. Rather than a yearly reset and a capped ceiling, SWAN holds roughly 90% U.S. Treasuries and spends the other 10% on in-the-money S&P 500 call options, aiming for uncapped index exposure with a bond core underneath.

Stated mandate

HJUN No data

SWAN The fund seeks to track the S-Network BlackSwan Core Index while pursuing uncapped S&P 500 exposure and buffering against significant losses. Its strategy uses approximately 90% U.S. Treasury securities and 10% SPY in-the-money call options.

Why people hold it

HJUN No data

  • SWAN Cheapest in its peer group at 0.49%, against a 0.79% median for buffer-style rivals such as BAPR (0.79%) and BUFR (0.95%).
  • No ceiling on gains. Defined-outcome funds sell away upside above a cap; SWAN's in-the-money SPY calls are built to leave the index climb uncapped.amplifyetfs.com
  • No outcome period to track: no annual reset date, no entry-timing math, no cap that expires and resets.amplifyetfs.com
  • Running the same recipe since 2018, through live market stress rather than backtests, and it stands among the stronger builds in its peer group.

Worth knowing

HJUN No data

  • SWAN The cushion isn't a stated number. Unlike a named-depth buffer fund (FEBT, DMAX), SWAN's downside comes from Treasuries plus option value, so it moves with markets.amplifyetfs.com
  • About 90% of the portfolio is Treasuries, so interest-rate moves drive results as much as the S&P 500 does.amplifyetfs.com
  • A small, thinly traded fund, so bid-ask spreads deserve more attention than with the giant buffer names.

Full HJUN profile⁠

Full SWAN profile⁠

HJUN vs SWAN Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

HJUN vs SWAN Cost

Overpaying SWAN vs HJUN

$3,643

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • HJUN 0.30%

    $6,149

  • SWAN 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • HJUN 0.30%
  • SWAN 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530SWAN $9,792HJUN $6,149

Year by year

YearHJUNSWANOverpaying
10$545$883$338
20$2,113$3,394$1,281
30$6,149$9,792$3,643

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%HJUN, cheaper
  • 0.49%SWAN
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer funds
  • Median 0.64%

HJUN cheapest of 7 funds

SWAN 2nd cheapest of 7 funds

HJUN vs SWAN Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
HJUN No data
SWAN 3.41%
Payout (12M)
HJUN None
SWAN $1.10
Last payment
HJUN No data
SWAN $0.27
Ex-dividend
HJUN No data
SWAN Sep 29, 2026
Paid on
HJUN No data
SWAN Sep 30, 2026
Frequency
HJUN No data
SWAN Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2018 to 2026, same scale for both

HJUNAll HJUN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SWANQuarterly · 32 paymentsAll SWAN payments⁠
One bar per payment. 32 payments from 2018 to 2026 YTD. Dec 28, 2018 $0.07; Mar 28, 2019 $0.12; Jun 27, 2019 $0.11; Sep 27, 2019 $0.08; Dec 30, 2019 $0.75; Mar 27, 2020 $0.07; Jun 26, 2020 $0.03; Sep 28, 2020 $0.007; Dec 29, 2020 $0.43; Mar 29, 2021 $0.007; Jun 28, 2021 $0.02; Sep 28, 2021 $0.04; Dec 29, 2021 $1.68; Mar 29, 2022 $0.06; Jun 28, 2022 $0.10; Sep 28, 2022 $0.18; Dec 28, 2022 $0.18; Mar 29, 2023 $0.20; Jun 28, 2023 $0.19; Sep 27, 2023 $0.19; Dec 27, 2023 $0.21; Mar 26, 2024 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.19; Sep 27, 2024 $0.15; Dec 30, 2024 $0.22; Mar 28, 2025 $0.22; Jun 27, 2025 $0.24; Sep 29, 2025 $0.23; Dec 30, 2025 $0.24; Mar 30, 2026 $0.24; Jun 29, 2026 $0.35; Sep 29, 2026 $0.27. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$1202020232026YTD

HJUN vs SWAN Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
HJUN No dataSWAN 11.4%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
HJUN No dataSWAN 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
HJUN No dataSWAN −31.0%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
HJUN 0.21SWAN 0.86

Popular comparisons

  • HJUNCvsPSFFB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SWANBvsPSFFB

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.66%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HJUNCvsQBSVC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SWANBvsQBSVC

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer5 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.64%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • HJUNCvsFBC

    Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF - June Series · ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • SWANBvsFBC

    Amplify BlackSwan Growth & Treasury Core ETF · ProShares S&P 500 Dynamic Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.58%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.