SCYB ranks 1st and PSH 52nd of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
PSH vs SCYB
SCYB −0.42pt a year
0.45%0.03%
SCYB 31.8×the volume
34.8K1.1M
PSH vs SCYB Performance
+2.6%+2.0%
- PSH 0.45%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- PSH $215M
- SCYB $2.8B
- PSH +2.6%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- PSH 6.49%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- PSH 492
- SCYB 1844
- PSH 34.8K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- PSH $48.94
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PSH | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C45 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A73 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B55 | B59Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B55 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. PSH and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSHC
SCYBA
In short
PSH Junk bonds with the interest-rate dial turned down. PSH is PGIM's active run at short-maturity high yield, measured against a 1-3 year high yield benchmark, and it pays monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
PSH The Fund seeks total return through current income and capital appreciation. It primarily invests in diversified below-investment-grade fixed-income instruments and normally commits at least 80% of investable assets to those instruments or economically similar investments.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PSH vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PSH vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying PSH vs SCYB
$8,403
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PSH 0.45%
$9,041
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PSH | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $812 | $55 | $757 |
| 20 | $3,128 | $216 | $2,912 |
| 30 | $9,041 | $638 | $8,403 |
- 0.45%PSH
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
PSH 45th cheapest of 84 funds
PSH vs SCYB Dividends
- PSH 6.49%
- SCYB 7.14%, better
- PSH $3.17
- SCYB $1.80
- PSH $0.27
- SCYB $0.16
- PSH Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- PSH Pays Nov 3, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- PSH Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
PSH vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PSH 2.3%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- PSH 0.65SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- PSH −3.1%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- PSH 0.14SCYB 0.28
PSH and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.45% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.45% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
