Skip to content

PSIL vs XPH

AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF

PSILFNYSE Arca

State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF

XPHBNYSE Arca

Overlap

11.6%by weight

Expense ratio

XPH −0.65pt a year

PSIL1.00%XPH0.35%

Avg volume · 30D

XPH 4.1×the volume

PSIL37.7KXPH155K

5Y return · a year

XPH +31.5pt

PSIL−24.0%XPH+7.5%

PSIL vs XPH Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

−74.7%PSIL+43.8%XPH

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. PSIL −74.7%. XPH +43.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−100%−50%−25%0%25%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PSIL 1.00%
XPH 0.35%, better
Fund size
PSIL $45M
XPH $454M
1Y total return
PSIL +15.5%
XPH +31.1%, better
Yield (12M)
PSIL 8.02%, better
XPH 0.42%
Holdings
PSIL 26
XPH 63
Avg volume (30D)
PSIL 37.7K sh
XPH 155K sh, better
NAV per share
PSIL $21.08
XPH $65.25
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PSIL: Cost 6, Risk 20, Mission not scored, Tradability 21, Holdings 55, Durability 25. XPH: Cost 79, Risk 42, Mission 64, Tradability 59, Holdings 89, Durability 69.
Pillar letters and Scores for PSIL, XPH, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPSILXPH
Cost30% weightF6A79Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredB64
Risk15% weightF20C42Higher
Tradability15% weightF21B59Higher
Holdings10% weightB55A89Higher
Durability5% weightD25B69Higher

Rank among Pharma & Therapeutics funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PSIL and XPH are both graded against the same 9 Pharma & Therapeutics funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Pharma & Therapeutics⁠

Category · 9 funds
See all 9 ›

XPH ranks 2nd and PSIL 9th of 9 funds in the Pharma & Therapeutics Category.

  1. Rank 1APPHVanEck Pharmaceutical ETFScore 74
  2. Rank 2BXPHState Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETFScore 67
  3. Rank 3BIHEiShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 8COZEMRoundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 9FPSILAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETFScore 19

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PSILFAdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF

XPHBState Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF

In short

PSIL The ticker is the thesis. PSIL is a compact, global, actively run basket of health care companies working on psychedelic medicine, with a stated goal of long-term capital appreciation in a corner of the market almost no other ETF touches.

XPH Most pharma funds are a mega-cap sandwich. XPH equal-weights instead, so a small-cap drugmaker gets roughly the same say as an industry giant, across about 60 names, for 0.35% a year.

Stated mandate

PSIL The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.

XPH The fund seeks to provide exposure to the pharmaceuticals segment of the S&P TMI.

Why people hold it

  • PSIL One ticker, the whole theme: a global basket of roughly two dozen health care names tied to psychedelic medicine, instead of hand-picking single clinical-stage stocks.advisorshares.com
  • Concentrated on purpose. At around 25 positions, the theme stays front and center rather than getting diluted inside a broad mega-cap pharma index.
  • Trading since 2021, so there is multi-year live operating history behind the strategy, not a simulated one.
  • XPH Modified equal weighting with quarterly rebalances: the index trims what has run and keeps real room for small and mid-cap drugmakers, not just the household names.ssga.com
  • At 0.35%, the cheapest sticker in its pharma peer group and well under the group median of 0.57% (PPH 0.36%, IHE 0.37%, PJP 0.57%, FTXH 0.60%).
  • Pure pharma, not a health care grab bag: it draws only from the pharmaceuticals segment of the S&P Total Market Index. No insurers, hospitals or device makers.ssga.com
  • Running since 2006 under a single index rulebook, with assets in the mid-size range and about 60 holdings behind it.

Worth knowing

  • PSIL Expensive by pharma-ETF standards: 1.84% a year, against 0.36% at PPH and 0.35% at XPH. A niche, actively managed mandate carries a niche price tag.
  • Small asset base and light trading volume. Spreads can be wide, so limit orders are the standard way to deal with a fund this thinly traded.
  • Within its pharma and therapeutics peer group it sits in the bottom quartile, held back mainly by cost and tradability rather than the theme itself.
  • XPH Equal weighting pulls the portfolio down the cap ladder, where trial results and FDA decisions can swing a single stock hard. Expect a bumpier ride than mega-cap pharma.ssga.com
  • One industry, one country. Drug pricing rules and patent cliffs hit the whole basket at once.
  • Moderately traded rather than a volume monster, so spreads can widen. Limit orders are the usual answer.

Full PSIL profile⁠

Full XPH profile⁠

PSIL vs XPH Holdings

How PSIL and XPH differ

Overlap by weight

11.6%

Shared holdings make up 36.4% of PSIL and 12.4% of XPH.

Level by level

  • Holdings7 in both11.6%
  • Countryby domicile67.9%
  • Asset classEquity100%
  • Sector1 Sector100%

Sector

Sector weights in PSIL and XPH, widest gap first
SectorMore in PSILMore in XPH
Health CareSame weight

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PSIL and XPH, widest gap first
CountryMore in PSILMore in XPH
United StatesXPH +32.1 points
CanadaPSIL +14.5 points
United KingdomPSIL +12.3 points
IrelandPSIL +4.4 points
AustraliaPSIL +0.9 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PSIL68.1%
  • XPH24.2%

Securities held

  • PSIL26
  • XPH62

Asset class

PSIL
Equity
XPH
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PSIL19
  • In both7
  • Only in XPH55

Only in PSIL

19 securities, 64.3% of PSIL by weight

  • Compass Pathways PLC11.68%
  • Helus Pharma Inc8.40%
  • AbbVie Inc5.50%

Only in XPH

55 securities, 87.5% of XPH by weight

  • Veradermics Inc2.86%
  • Xeris Biopharma Holdings Inc2.76%
  • Pacira Biosciences Inc2.51%

Weight gaps

All 7 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in PSIL and XPH, widest gap first
HoldingMore in PSILMore in XPH
Definium Therapeutics IncDFTXPSIL +10.03 points
Relmada Therapeutics IncRLMDPSIL +4.21 points
Eli Lilly & CoLLYPSIL +3.70 points
Johnson & JohnsonJNJPSIL +2.80 points
Alto Neuroscience IncANROPSIL +2.64 points
Supernus Pharmaceuticals IncSUPNPSIL +1.41 points
Indivior Pharmaceuticals IncINDVXPH +0.84 points

All 25 PSIL holdings⁠All 62 XPH holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PSIL vs XPH Cost

Overpaying PSIL vs XPH

$11,562

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PSIL 1.00%

    $18,688

  • XPH 0.35%

    $7,126

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PSIL 1.00%
  • XPH 0.35%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530PSIL $18,688XPH $7,126

Year by year

YearPSILXPHOverpaying
10$1,763$634$1,129
20$6,625$2,454$4,171
30$18,688$7,126$11,562

Expense ratio

  • 1.00%PSIL
  • 0.35%XPH, cheaper
  • Middle half of Pharma & Therapeutics funds
  • Median 0.58%

XPH 2nd cheapest of 9 funds

PSIL 9th cheapest of 9 funds

PSIL vs XPH Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PSIL 8.02%, better
XPH 0.42%
Payout (12M)
PSIL $1.68
XPH $0.27
Last payment
PSIL $1.68
XPH $0.04
Ex-dividend
PSIL Dec 22, 2025
XPH Sep 21, 2026
Paid on
PSIL Dec 29, 2025
XPH Sep 23, 2026
Frequency
PSIL Quarterly
XPH Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PSILQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll PSIL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 23, 2024 $0.11; Dec 23, 2024 $0.05; Mar 21, 2025 $0.16; Jun 23, 2025 $0.01; Sep 22, 2025 $0.02; Dec 22, 2025 $1.68. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
XPHQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll XPH payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 17, 2017 $0.03; Jun 16, 2017 $0.09; Sep 15, 2017 $0.07; Dec 15, 2017 $0.11; Mar 16, 2018 $0.02; Jun 15, 2018 $0.06; Sep 24, 2018 $0.05; Dec 24, 2018 $0.11; Mar 18, 2019 $0.07; Jun 24, 2019 $0.07; Sep 23, 2019 $0.08; Dec 23, 2019 $0.07; Mar 23, 2020 $0.07; Jun 22, 2020 $0.07; Sep 21, 2020 $0.05; Dec 21, 2020 $0.05; Mar 22, 2021 $0.07; Jun 21, 2021 $0.08; Sep 20, 2021 $0.09; Dec 20, 2021 $0.19; Mar 21, 2022 $0.18; Jun 21, 2022 $0.16; Sep 19, 2022 $0.13; Dec 19, 2022 $0.19; Mar 20, 2023 $0.12; Jun 20, 2023 $0.12; Sep 18, 2023 $0.12; Dec 18, 2023 $0.17; Mar 18, 2024 $0.17; Jun 24, 2024 $0.16; Sep 23, 2024 $0.19; Dec 23, 2024 $0.15; Mar 24, 2025 $0.15; Jun 23, 2025 $0.10; Sep 22, 2025 $0.10; Dec 22, 2025 $0.11; Mar 23, 2026 $0.06; Jun 22, 2026 $0.06; Sep 21, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

PSIL vs XPH Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • PSIL
  • XPH
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: PSIL −92.8% · Oct 2024. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−100%−75%−50%−25%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PSIL 46.8%XPH 19.3%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PSIL 0.44XPH 0.95, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PSIL −92.8%XPH −30.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PSIL 0.56XPH 0.72

PSIL and XPH in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PSILFvsPPHA

    AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF · VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XPHBvsPPHA

    State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF · VanEck Pharmaceutical ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSILFvsIHEB

    AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF · iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XPHBvsIHEB

    State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF · iShares U.S. Pharmaceuticals ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.37%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PSILFvsPBPHB

    AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF · Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.00% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XPHBvsPBPHB

    State Street SPDR S&P Pharmaceuticals ETF · Portfolio Building Block World Pharma and Biotech Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.13%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.