TBT ranks 1st and PST 4th of 7 funds in the Inverse Treasury Category.
PST vs TBT
TBT −0.02pt a year
0.95%0.93%
TBT 50.7×the volume
6.43K326K
PST +0.1pt
+3.1%+3.0%
PST vs TBT Performance
+66.9%+157.8%
- PST 0.95%
- TBT 0.93%, better
- PST $11M
- TBT $289M
- PST +12.3%
- TBT +19.4%, better
- PST 2.48%, better
- TBT 2.38%
- PST 2
- TBT 3
- PST 6.43K sh
- TBT 326K sh, better
- PST $24.06
- TBT $38.27
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PST | TBT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B56 | A89Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B63Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | D33 | B64Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | C52Higher |
| Durability | C41 | B67Higher |
Rank among Inverse Treasury funds
Same Category. PST and TBT are both graded against the same 7 Inverse Treasury funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PSTC
TBTB
In short
PST Most inverse Treasury ETFs aim at the 20+ year long bond. PST aims at the belly: two times the inverse of the daily move in the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index, reset each day, trading since 2008.
TBT The original way to lean against long Treasuries. Live since 2008, TBT aims to deliver twice the inverse of the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index's daily move, at the lowest fee in the leveraged bear-Treasury crowd.
Stated mandate
PST The Fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, corresponding to approximately two times the inverse of the daily performance of the ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. It does not seek this -2x target for periods other than a day.
TBT The fund seeks inverse, twice-magnified daily exposure to the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, aiming to benefit when that index's daily price declines.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PST vs TBT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PST vs TBT Cost
Overpaying PST vs TBT
$330
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PST 0.95%
$17,869
TBT 0.93%
$17,539
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PST | TBT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,678 | $1,644 | $34 |
| 20 | $6,322 | $6,199 | $123 |
| 30 | $17,869 | $17,539 | $330 |
- 0.95%PST
- 0.93%TBT, cheaper
- Middle half of Inverse Treasury funds
- Median 0.95%
TBT cheapest of 7 funds
PST 2nd cheapest of 7 funds
PST vs TBT Dividends
- PST 2.48%, better
- TBT 2.38%
- PST $0.60
- TBT $0.92
- PST $0.15
- TBT $0.23
- PST Sep 23, 2026
- TBT Sep 23, 2026
- PST Sep 29, 2026
- TBT Sep 29, 2026
- PST Quarterly
- TBT Quarterly
Distribution history
PST vs TBT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PST
- TBT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PST 13.3%, betterTBT 26.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- PST −0.20TBT −0.05, better
- Worst fall
- PST −16.2%, betterTBT −33.8%
- Market sensitivity
- PST −2.34TBT −4.80
PST and TBT in the news
Price vs Value
Bond ETF premiums widened on Columbus Day, then narrowed

Popular comparisons
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.93% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.