XHS ranks 4th and PTH 13th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
PTH vs XHS
XHS −0.25pt a year
0.60%0.35%
PTH 1.7×the volume
53.6K31.9K
PTH +3.5pt
+15.1%+11.6%
PTH vs XHS Performance
+8.0%+34.4%
- PTH 0.60%
- XHS 0.35%, better
- PTH $295M
- XHS $234M
- PTH +22.4%
- XHS +38.0%, better
- PTH 2.64%, better
- XHS 0.15%
- PTH 55
- XHS 63
- PTH 53.6K sh, better
- XHS 31.9K sh
- PTH $59.73
- XHS $144.25
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PTH | XHS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D38 | A81Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D37 | A78Higher |
| Tradability | B68Higher | C54 |
| Holdings | A73 | A87Higher |
| Durability | A71Higher | B64 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. PTH and XHS are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PTHC
XHSA
In short
PTH Health care ranked by price strength instead of market cap. PTH's index has been running since 2006, holds about 50 relative-strength names, and reshuffles them every quarter, so the lineup can look nothing like the sector's megacap giants.
XHS Most health care ETFs are pharma funds in disguise. XHS buys the delivery system instead: insurers, hospitals, distributors and clinics, roughly equal weighted so one giant insurer does not run the show.
Stated mandate
PTH The Fund seeks to track the performance of its underlying index before fees and expenses. The index selects healthcare companies exhibiting relative strength or momentum.
XHS The fund seeks to track the total return of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index before fees and expenses, providing targeted exposure to health care services companies.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PTH vs XHS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PTH vs XHS Cost
Overpaying PTH vs XHS
$4,691
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PTH 0.60%
$11,817
XHS 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PTH | XHS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,076 | $634 | $442 |
| 20 | $4,116 | $2,454 | $1,662 |
| 30 | $11,817 | $7,126 | $4,691 |
- 0.60%PTH
- 0.35%XHS, cheaper
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
XHS 5th cheapest of 25 funds
PTH 16th cheapest of 25 funds
PTH vs XHS Dividends
- PTH 2.64%, better
- XHS 0.15%
- PTH $1.53
- XHS $0.21
- PTH $1.53
- XHS $0.01
- PTH Dec 22, 2025
- XHS Sep 21, 2026
- PTH Dec 26, 2025
- XHS Sep 23, 2026
- PTH Irregular
- XHS Quarterly
Distribution history
PTH vs XHS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PTH
- XHS
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PTH 23.9%XHS 20.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PTH 0.93, betterXHS 0.85
- Worst fall
- PTH −47.1%XHS −30.0%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PTH 0.97XHS 0.93
PTH and XHS in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
