FHLC ranks 2nd and PTH 13th of 25 funds in the Health Care (Broad) Category.
FHLC vs PTH
FHLC −0.52pt a year
0.08%0.60%
FHLC 4.6×the volume
246K53.6K
PTH +2.6pt
+12.5%+15.1%
FHLC vs PTH Performance
+41.1%+8.0%
- FHLC 0.08%, better
- PTH 0.60%
- FHLC $3.54B
- PTH $295M
- FHLC +28.5%, better
- PTH +22.4%
- FHLC 1.15%
- PTH 2.64%, better
- FHLC 344
- PTH 55
- FHLC 246K sh, better
- PTH 53.6K sh
- FHLC $88.53
- PTH $59.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FHLC | PTH |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A98Higher | D38 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | A79Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | A79Higher | B68 |
| Holdings | C54 | A73Higher |
| Durability | A77Higher | A71 |
Rank among Health Care (Broad) funds
Same Category. FHLC and PTH are both graded against the same 25 Health Care (Broad) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FHLCA
PTHC
In short
FHLC Health care, whole market. FHLC tracks an MSCI index that runs from mega-cap pharma down to small-cap biotech and device makers, roughly 400 names, for 0.08% a year.
PTH Health care ranked by price strength instead of market cap. PTH's index has been running since 2006, holds about 50 relative-strength names, and reshuffles them every quarter, so the lineup can look nothing like the sector's megacap giants.
Stated mandate
FHLC The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index before fees and expenses.
PTH The Fund seeks to track the performance of its underlying index before fees and expenses. The index selects healthcare companies exhibiting relative strength or momentum.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FHLC vs PTH Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FHLC vs PTH Cost
Overpaying PTH vs FHLC
$10,044
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FHLC 0.084%
$1,773
PTH 0.60%
$11,817
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FHLC | PTH | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $154 | $1,076 | $922 |
| 20 | $603 | $4,116 | $3,513 |
| 30 | $1,773 | $11,817 | $10,044 |
- 0.08%FHLC, cheaper
- 0.60%PTH
- Middle half of Health Care (Broad) funds
- Median 0.50%
FHLC 2nd cheapest of 25 funds
PTH 16th cheapest of 25 funds
FHLC vs PTH Dividends
- FHLC 1.15%
- PTH 2.64%, better
- FHLC $1.02
- PTH $1.53
- FHLC $0.25
- PTH $1.53
- FHLC Sep 18, 2026
- PTH Dec 22, 2025
- FHLC Sep 22, 2026
- PTH Dec 26, 2025
- FHLC Quarterly
- PTH Irregular
Distribution history
FHLC vs PTH Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FHLC
- PTH
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FHLC 14.5%, betterPTH 23.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- FHLC 0.83PTH 0.93, better
- Worst fall
- FHLC −17.7%, betterPTH −47.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FHLC 0.59PTH 0.97
FHLC and PTH in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.09%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.60% · 0.35%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
