Skip to content

PTLC vs QQWZ

Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

PTLCACboe

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

QQWZBNasdaq

Overlap

54.5%by weight

Expense ratio

QQWZ −0.11pt a year

PTLC0.60%QQWZ0.49%

Avg volume · 30D

PTLC 5.1×the volume

PTLC99.6KQQWZ19.5K

PTLC vs QQWZ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+6.4%PTLC−0.3%QQWZ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. PTLC +6.4%. QQWZ −0.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
PTLC 0.60%
QQWZ 0.49%, better
Fund size
PTLC $3.24B
QQWZ $42M
1Y total return
PTLC +6.4%, better
QQWZ −0.3%
Yield (12M)
PTLC 1.00%, better
QQWZ 0.69%
Holdings
PTLC 505
QQWZ 102
Avg volume (30D)
PTLC 99.6K sh, better
QQWZ 19.5K sh
NAV per share
PTLC $59.01
QQWZ $25.71
52W range

ETF.net Grade

PTLC: Cost 71, Risk 65, Mission 78, Tradability 100, Holdings 72, Durability 86. QQWZ: Cost 84, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 58, Durability 36.
Pillar letters and Scores for PTLC, QQWZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarPTLCQQWZ
Cost30% weightA71A84Higher
Mission25% weightA78Not scored
Risk15% weightB65HigherD32
Tradability15% weightA100HigherB65
Holdings10% weightA72HigherB58
Durability5% weightA86HigherD36

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. PTLC and QQWZ are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

PTLC ranks 2nd and QQWZ 6th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 3AONOFGlobal X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETFScore 75
  4. Rank 5BWIMAWisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 68
  5. Rank 6BQQWZPacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

PTLCAPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

QQWZBPacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

In short

PTLC Most index funds ride out every drawdown. PTLC tracks an index with an exit ramp: a rules-based trend signal that shifts its large-cap exposure toward 3-month Treasury bills and back, with no manager judgment in the loop.

QQWZ No data

Stated mandate

PTLC The Fund seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index. That index uses a rules-based trend-following approach that alternates exposure between equities and 3-Month US Treasury bills.

QQWZ No data

Why people hold it

  • PTLC The switch is mechanical. A rules-based trend signal alternates exposure between US large-cap equities and 3-month Treasury bills, so nobody is making a gut call mid-panic.paceretfs.com
  • Underneath the signal sits plain large-cap America: roughly 500 stocks benchmarked to the S&P 500, not a niche factor slice.paceretfs.com
  • Trading since 2015 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, so the rules have run through live markets, not just backtests.
  • Among the index-tracking funds we cover, it lands in the upper half, and it follows its own index closely.

QQWZ No data

Worth knowing

  • PTLC 0.60% a year is real money next to vanilla large-cap trackers like SCHK (0.03%) or VOOV (0.07%). The trend rules are what the extra buys.
  • Trend signals read past prices. Moves into T-bills, or back into stocks, arrive after a market shift is already underway rather than ahead of it.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year, so it isn't structured as a steady income drip.

QQWZ No data

Full PTLC profile⁠

Full QQWZ profile⁠

PTLC vs QQWZ Holdings

As of

How PTLC and QQWZ differ

Overlap by weight

54.5%

Shared holdings make up 92.9% of QQWZ and 54.5% of PTLC.

Level by level

  • Holdings86 in both54.5%
  • Sector11 Sectors76.4%
  • Countryby domicile97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in PTLC and QQWZ, widest gap first
SectorMore in PTLCMore in QQWZ
TechnologyQQWZ +18.3 points
FinancialsPTLC +11.0 points
Health CarePTLC +4.9 points
EnergyPTLC +2.9 points
Consumer StaplesQQWZ +2.0 points
IndustrialsPTLC +1.8 points
Consumer DiscretionaryQQWZ +1.7 points
CommunicationQQWZ +1.7 points
Real EstatePTLC +1.7 points
UtilitiesPTLC +0.8 points
MaterialsPTLC +0.6 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in PTLC and QQWZ, widest gap first
CountryMore in PTLCMore in QQWZ
United StatesPTLC +2.2 points
CanadaQQWZ +1.1 points
NetherlandsQQWZ +0.9 points
Other countries (6)QQWZ +0.3 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • PTLC38.4%
  • QQWZ47.2%

Securities held

  • PTLC503
  • QQWZ101

Asset class

PTLC
Equity
QQWZ
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in PTLC417
  • In both86
  • Only in QQWZ15

Only in PTLC

417 securities, 45.5% of PTLC by weight

  • Eli Lilly & Co1.50%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.48%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co.1.31%

Only in QQWZ

15 securities, 7.1% of QQWZ by weight

  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp2.92%
  • Shopify Inc0.90%
  • ASML Holding NV0.67%

Weight gaps

All 86 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in PTLC and QQWZ, widest gap first
HoldingMore in PTLCMore in QQWZ
Micron Technology IncMUQQWZ +2.87 points
Advanced Micro Devices IncAMDQQWZ +2.51 points
Walmart IncWMTQQWZ +1.68 points
Tesla IncTSLAQQWZ +1.51 points
Intel CorpINTCQQWZ +1.42 points
Palantir Technologies IncPLTRQQWZ +1.29 points
Costco Wholesale CorpCOSTQQWZ +1.23 points
Cisco Systems IncCSCOQQWZ +1.18 points

All 505 PTLC holdings⁠All 102 QQWZ holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

PTLC vs QQWZ Cost

Overpaying PTLC vs QQWZ

$2,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • PTLC 0.60%

    $11,817

  • QQWZ 0.49%

    $9,792

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • PTLC 0.60%
  • QQWZ 0.49%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530PTLC $11,817QQWZ $9,792

Year by year

YearPTLCQQWZOverpaying
10$1,076$883$193
20$4,116$3,394$722
30$11,817$9,792$2,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.60%PTLC
  • 0.49%QQWZ, cheaper
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

QQWZ 4th cheapest of 20 funds

PTLC 6th cheapest of 20 funds

PTLC vs QQWZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
PTLC 1.00%, better
QQWZ 0.69%
Payout (12M)
PTLC $0.59
QQWZ $0.18
Last payment
PTLC $0.59
QQWZ $0.02
Ex-dividend
PTLC Dec 30, 2025
QQWZ Sep 3, 2026
Paid on
PTLC Jan 5, 2026
QQWZ Sep 8, 2026
Frequency
PTLC Annual
QQWZ Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

PTLCAnnual · 9 paymentsAll PTLC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2017 $0.28; Dec 24, 2018 $0.29; Dec 24, 2019 $0.37; Dec 21, 2020 $0.35; Dec 23, 2021 $0.31; Dec 22, 2022 $0.47; Dec 27, 2023 $0.51; Dec 27, 2024 $0.36; Dec 30, 2025 $0.59. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
QQWZQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll QQWZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 5, 2025 $0.0035; Sep 4, 2025 $0.0086; Dec 30, 2025 $0.02; Mar 5, 2026 $0.07; Jun 4, 2026 $0.07; Sep 3, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

PTLC vs QQWZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
PTLC 11.7%QQWZ 18.0%since Jun 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
PTLC 0.95QQWZ 0.62since Jun 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
PTLC −15.2%QQWZ −13.7%since May 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
PTLC 0.87QQWZ 0.68

PTLC and QQWZ in the news

Popular comparisons

  • PTLCAvsWAMAA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQWZBvsWAMAA

    Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF · WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsONOFA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQWZBvsONOFA

    Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • PTLCAvsPTMCA

    Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.60% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQWZBvsPTMCA

    Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.