Skip to content

QQWZ vs WAMA

Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF

QQWZBNasdaq

WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund

WAMAANasdaq

Overlap

51.4%by weight

Expense ratio

WAMA −0.16pt a year

QQWZ0.49%WAMA0.33%

Avg volume · 30D

QQWZ 1.6×the volume

QQWZ19.5KWAMA12.4K

QQWZ vs WAMA Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−6.5%QQWZ+1.3%WAMA

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QQWZ −6.5%. WAMA +1.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%5%7.5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QQWZ 0.49%
WAMA 0.33%, better
Fund size
QQWZ $42M
WAMA $199M
1Y total return
QQWZ −0.3%
WAMA No data
Yield (12M)
QQWZ 0.69%
WAMA No data
Holdings
QQWZ 102
WAMA 507
Avg volume (30D)
QQWZ 19.5K sh, better
WAMA 12.4K sh
NAV per share
QQWZ $25.71
WAMA $26.51
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QQWZ: Cost 84, Risk 32, Mission not scored, Tradability 65, Holdings 58, Durability 36. WAMA: Cost 100, Risk 84, Mission not scored, Tradability 54, Holdings 69, Durability 62.
Pillar letters and Scores for QQWZ, WAMA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQQWZWAMA
Cost30% weightA84A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD32A84Higher
Tradability15% weightB65HigherC54
Holdings10% weightB58B69Higher
Durability5% weightD36B62Higher

Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QQWZ and WAMA are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

WAMA ranks 1st and QQWZ 6th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.

  1. Rank 1AWAMAWisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 80
  2. Rank 2APTLCPacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 5BWIMAWisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average FundScore 68
  4. Rank 6BQQWZPacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 7BPTNQPacer Trendpilot 100 ETFScore 62

QQWZ vs WAMA Holdings

As of

How QQWZ and WAMA differ

Overlap by weight

51.4%

Shared holdings make up 90.8% of QQWZ and 53.4% of WAMA.

Level by level

  • Holdings90 in both51.4%
  • Countryby domicile97.4%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

No Sector split for WAMA.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QQWZ and WAMA, widest gap first
CountryMore in QQWZMore in WAMA
United StatesWAMA +2.4 points
CanadaQQWZ +1.1 points
NetherlandsQQWZ +0.9 points
Other countries (6)QQWZ +0.5 points

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QQWZ47.2%
  • WAMA40.1%

Securities held

  • QQWZ101
  • WAMA505

Asset class

QQWZ
Equity
WAMA
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QQWZ11
  • In both90
  • Only in WAMA415

Only in QQWZ

11 securities, 9.1% of QQWZ by weight

  • Space Exploration Technologies Corp2.92%
  • Alphabet Inc2.83%
  • Shopify Inc0.90%

Only in WAMA

415 securities, 46.4% of WAMA by weight

  • Eli Lilly & Co2.09%
  • Berkshire Hathaway Inc1.75%
  • JPMorgan Chase & Co1.38%

Weight gaps

All 90 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in QQWZ and WAMA, widest gap first
HoldingMore in QQWZMore in WAMA
Micron Technology IncMUQQWZ +2.98 points
Advanced Micro Devices IncAMDQQWZ +2.60 points
Alphabet IncGOOGLWAMA +2.03 points
Intel CorpINTCQQWZ +1.65 points
Tesla IncTSLAQQWZ +1.38 points
Palantir Technologies IncPLTRQQWZ +1.36 points
Costco Wholesale CorpCOSTQQWZ +1.23 points
Cisco Systems IncCSCOQQWZ +1.19 points

All 102 QQWZ holdings⁠All WAMA holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QQWZ vs WAMA Cost

Overpaying QQWZ vs WAMA

$3,055

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QQWZ 0.49%

    $9,792

  • WAMA 0.33%

    $6,737

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QQWZ 0.49%
  • WAMA 0.33%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530QQWZ $9,792WAMA $6,737

Year by year

YearQQWZWAMAOverpaying
10$883$598$285
20$3,394$2,318$1,076
30$9,792$6,737$3,055

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%QQWZ
  • 0.33%WAMA, cheaper
  • Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
  • Median 0.67%

WAMA cheapest of 20 funds

QQWZ 4th cheapest of 20 funds

QQWZ vs WAMA Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QQWZ 0.69%
WAMA No data
Payout (12M)
QQWZ $0.18
WAMA No data
Last payment
QQWZ $0.02
WAMA $0.05
Ex-dividend
QQWZ Sep 3, 2026
WAMA Sep 25, 2026
Paid on
QQWZ Sep 8, 2026
WAMA Sep 29, 2026
Frequency
QQWZ Quarterly
WAMA Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

QQWZQuarterly · 6 paymentsAll QQWZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 6 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 5, 2025 $0.0035; Sep 4, 2025 $0.0086; Dec 30, 2025 $0.02; Mar 5, 2026 $0.07; Jun 4, 2026 $0.07; Sep 3, 2026 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD
WAMAQuarterly · 2 paymentsAll WAMA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jun 25, 2026 $0.11; Sep 25, 2026 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.102026YTD

QQWZ vs WAMA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QQWZ 18.0%since Jun 2025WAMA No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QQWZ 0.62since Jun 2025WAMA No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QQWZ −13.7%since May 2025WAMA No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QQWZ 0.68WAMA 0.59

Popular comparisons

  • QQWZBvsPTLCA

    Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WAMAAvsPTLCA

    WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQWZBvsONOFA

    Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WAMAAvsONOFA

    WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QQWZBvsPTMCA

    Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WAMAAvsPTMCA

    WisdomTree US Adaptive Moving Average Fund · Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.60%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.