ONOF ranks 3rd and QQWZ 6th of 20 funds in the Trend-Following / Tactical Index Category.
ONOF vs QQWZ
ONOF −0.10pt a year
0.39%0.49%
QQWZ 3.4×the volume
5.82K19.5K
ONOF vs QQWZ Performance
+7.7%−0.3%
- ONOF 0.39%, better
- QQWZ 0.49%
- ONOF $140M
- QQWZ $42M
- ONOF +7.7%, better
- QQWZ −0.3%
- ONOF 1.22%, better
- QQWZ 0.69%
- ONOF 504
- QQWZ 102
- ONOF 5.82K sh
- QQWZ 19.5K sh, better
- ONOF $40.37
- QQWZ $25.71
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ONOF | QQWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | A84 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | D32 |
| Tradability | B59 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A76Higher | B58 |
| Durability | B56Higher | D36 |
Rank among Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
Same Category. ONOF and QQWZ are both graded against the same 20 Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ONOFA
QQWZB
In short
ONOF The ticker says it out loud: ONOF is an on/off switch. Four technical indicators decide whether it owns a broad basket of U.S. stocks or sits in short-term Treasuries. Rules, not hunches.
Stated mandate
ONOF ONOF seeks to track the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index before fees and expenses. Its four technical indicators shift the Fund between U.S. equities and defensive short-term Treasuries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ONOF vs QQWZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ONOF vs QQWZ Cost
Overpaying QQWZ vs ONOF
$1,894
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ONOF 0.39%
$7,898
QQWZ 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ONOF | QQWZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $705 | $883 | $178 |
| 20 | $2,725 | $3,394 | $669 |
| 30 | $7,898 | $9,792 | $1,894 |
- 0.39%ONOF, cheaper
- 0.49%QQWZ
- Middle half of Trend-Following / Tactical Index funds
- Median 0.67%
ONOF 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
QQWZ 4th cheapest of 20 funds
ONOF vs QQWZ Dividends
- ONOF 1.22%, better
- QQWZ 0.69%
- ONOF $0.49
- QQWZ $0.18
- ONOF $0.16
- QQWZ $0.02
- ONOF Jun 29, 2026
- QQWZ Sep 3, 2026
- ONOF Jul 2, 2026
- QQWZ Sep 8, 2026
- ONOF Twice a year
- QQWZ Quarterly
Distribution history
ONOF vs QQWZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ONOF 12.0%QQWZ 18.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ONOF 0.82QQWZ 0.62
- Worst fall
- ONOF −26.2%QQWZ −13.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ONOF 0.96QQWZ 0.68
Popular comparisons
- 0.39% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.39% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.60%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.