SUB ranks 2nd and PUSH 9th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
PUSH vs SUB
SUB −0.08pt a year
0.15%0.07%
SUB 19.1×the volume
45.1K860K
PUSH vs SUB Performance
+2.9%+2.1%
- PUSH 0.15%
- SUB 0.07%, better
- PUSH $202M
- SUB $13.3B
- PUSH +2.9%, better
- SUB +2.1%
- PUSH 3.40%, better
- SUB 2.79%
- PUSH 410
- SUB 3188
- PUSH 45.1K sh
- SUB 860K sh, better
- PUSH $50.14
- SUB $105.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PUSH | SUB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B64Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | D34 | B60Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | A81Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A94Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. PUSH and SUB are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PUSHA
SUBA
In short
PUSH The muni cousin of PGIM's big ultra-short bond fund: an active, 0.15% portfolio of very short municipal bonds, run by PGIM's own muni desk and paying federally tax-exempt income monthly.
SUB Munis, but only the near end of the curve. Since 2008 SUB has tracked an AMT-free index of investment-grade municipal bonds maturing inside five years, paying tax-exempt income monthly with far less rate sensitivity than long-dated muni funds.
Stated mandate
PUSH The fund seeks total return from current income exempt from federal income taxes and capital appreciation.
SUB The fund seeks to track an index of short-term, investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds maturing from one month through five years, providing tax-exempt income while managing interest-rate risk.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PUSH vs SUB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PUSH vs SUB Cost
Overpaying PUSH vs SUB
$1,657
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PUSH 0.15%
$3,137
SUB 0.07%
$1,480
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PUSH | SUB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $128 | $146 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $503 | $568 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,480 | $1,657 |
- 0.15%PUSH
- 0.07%SUB, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
SUB 3rd cheapest of 27 funds
PUSH 6th cheapest of 27 funds
PUSH vs SUB Dividends
- PUSH 3.40%, better
- SUB 2.79%
- PUSH $1.71
- SUB $2.95
- PUSH $0.13
- SUB $0.23
- PUSH Oct 30, 2026
- SUB Nov 2, 2026
- PUSH Pays Nov 3, 2026
- SUB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- PUSH Monthly
- SUB Monthly
Distribution history
PUSH vs SUB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PUSH 1.3%SUB 2.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PUSH −0.56SUB −0.59
- Worst fall
- PUSH −1.3%SUB −4.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PUSH 0.04SUB 0.26
PUSH and SUB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.07% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

