VTES ranks 1st and PUSH 9th of 27 funds in the Short-Duration Municipal Bonds Category.
PUSH vs VTES
VTES −0.10pt a year
0.15%0.05%
VTES 11.1×the volume
45.1K498K
PUSH vs VTES Performance
+2.9%+1.6%
- PUSH 0.15%
- VTES 0.05%, better
- PUSH $202M
- VTES $3.6B
- PUSH +2.9%, better
- VTES +1.6%
- PUSH 3.40%, better
- VTES 2.91%
- PUSH 410
- VTES 3913
- PUSH 45.1K sh
- VTES 498K sh, better
- PUSH $50.14
- VTES $100.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PUSH | VTES |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A80 | A98Higher |
| Mission | A100 | A100 |
| Risk | B64Higher | D37 |
| Tradability | D34 | A72Higher |
| Holdings | B56 | B63Higher |
| Durability | D36 | A83Higher |
Rank among Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
Same Category. PUSH and VTES are both graded against the same 27 Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PUSHA
VTESA
In short
PUSH The muni cousin of PGIM's big ultra-short bond fund: an active, 0.15% portfolio of very short municipal bonds, run by PGIM's own muni desk and paying federally tax-exempt income monthly.
VTES Vanguard's muni ETF on a short leash: an AMT-free tax-exempt index, but capped at seven years to trim interest-rate sensitivity. Five basis points, roughly 2,700 bonds, income paid monthly.
Stated mandate
PUSH The fund seeks total return from current income exempt from federal income taxes and capital appreciation.
VTES The Fund seeks to track an index representing investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds with remaining maturities from one month through seven years.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PUSH vs VTES Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PUSH vs VTES Cost
Overpaying PUSH vs VTES
$2,077
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PUSH 0.15%
$3,137
VTES 0.05%
$1,060
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PUSH | VTES | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $92 | $182 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $360 | $711 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $1,060 | $2,077 |
- 0.15%PUSH
- 0.05%VTES, cheaper
- Middle half of Short-Duration Municipal Bonds funds
- Median 0.21%
VTES cheapest of 27 funds
PUSH 6th cheapest of 27 funds
PUSH vs VTES Dividends
- PUSH 3.40%, better
- VTES 2.91%
- PUSH $1.71
- VTES $2.92
- PUSH $0.13
- VTES $0.23
- PUSH Oct 30, 2026
- VTES Nov 2, 2026
- PUSH Pays Nov 3, 2026
- VTES Pays Nov 4, 2026
- PUSH Monthly
- VTES Monthly
Distribution history
PUSH vs VTES Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PUSH 1.3%VTES 2.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- PUSH −0.56VTES −0.33
- Worst fall
- PUSH −1.3%VTES −3.0%
- Market sensitivity
- PUSH 0.04VTES 0.37
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.