VTEB ranks 1st and PWZ 22nd of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
PWZ vs VTEB
VTEB −0.25pt a year
0.28%0.03%
VTEB 21.9×the volume
782K17.2M
VTEB +0.4pt
+1.5%+1.9%
PWZ vs VTEB Performance
−2.4%+3.1%
- PWZ 0.28%
- VTEB 0.03%, better
- PWZ $1.23B
- VTEB $52.4B
- PWZ −1.2%
- VTEB +0.1%, better
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- VTEB 3.47%
- PWZ 1302
- VTEB 11156
- PWZ 782K sh
- VTEB 17.2M sh, better
- PWZ $23.03
- VTEB $48.83
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PWZ | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A99Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D35 | B58Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A81 | A95Higher |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. PWZ and VTEB are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PWZB
VTEBA
In short
PWZ A California-only muni ETF that has been running since 2007 and leans long: its index targets longer-dated, core-plus California bonds, federally tax-exempt, AMT-free, with cash paid out monthly.
VTEB Vanguard's national muni index fund, running since 2015 at three basis points, a tenth of what the typical muni ETF charges. Its benchmark screens for investment-grade bonds whose income is exempt from federal tax and the AMT.
Stated mandate
PWZ The fund is designed around the ICE BofAML California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index and generally invests at least 80% of assets in index municipal securities that are federally tax-exempt.
VTEB VTEB seeks to track an index measuring the investment-grade segment of the U.S. municipal bond market. It uses passive sampling to approximate the index and generally invests in federally tax-exempt municipal securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PWZ vs VTEB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PWZ vs VTEB Cost
Overpaying PWZ vs VTEB
$5,117
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PWZ 0.28%
$5,755
VTEB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PWZ | VTEB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $55 | $454 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $216 | $1,760 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $638 | $5,117 |
- 0.28%PWZ
- 0.03%VTEB, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VTEB cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ 24th cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ vs VTEB Dividends
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- VTEB 3.47%
- PWZ $0.92
- VTEB $1.70
- PWZ $0.08
- VTEB $0.14
- PWZ Oct 19, 2026
- VTEB Oct 1, 2026
- PWZ Oct 23, 2026
- VTEB Oct 5, 2026
- PWZ Monthly
- VTEB Monthly
Distribution history
PWZ vs VTEB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- PWZ
- VTEB
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PWZ 8.2%VTEB 5.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- PWZ 0.01, betterVTEB −0.004
- Worst fall
- PWZ −17.1%VTEB −12.3%, better
- Market sensitivity
- PWZ 1.26VTEB 0.95
PWZ and VTEB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





