VCRM ranks 4th and PWZ 22nd of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
PWZ vs VCRM
VCRM −0.16pt a year
0.28%0.12%
PWZ 1.2×the volume
782K679K
PWZ vs VCRM Performance
−1.2%+1.1%
- PWZ 0.28%
- VCRM 0.12%, better
- PWZ $1.23B
- VCRM $2.2B
- PWZ −1.2%
- VCRM +1.1%, better
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- PWZ 1302
- VCRM 2588
- PWZ 782K sh, better
- VCRM 679K sh
- PWZ $23.03
- VCRM $73.95
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PWZ | VCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B60 | A89Higher |
| Mission | A92 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D35 | B68Higher |
| Tradability | C53 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | A73 | A81Higher |
| Durability | A81Higher | A74 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. PWZ and VCRM are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PWZB
VCRMA
In short
PWZ A California-only muni ETF that has been running since 2007 and leans long: its index targets longer-dated, core-plus California bonds, federally tax-exempt, AMT-free, with cash paid out monthly.
VCRM Vanguard's active answer in a mostly-index category: managers working the whole muni curve for 0.12% a year, under half the muni ETF median fee. Monthly income, exempt from federal personal income taxes.
Stated mandate
PWZ The fund is designed around the ICE BofAML California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index and generally invests at least 80% of assets in index municipal securities that are federally tax-exempt.
VCRM The fund seeks total return through current income exempt from federal personal income taxes and capital appreciation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PWZ vs VCRM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PWZ vs VCRM Cost
Overpaying PWZ vs VCRM
$3,235
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PWZ 0.28%
$5,755
VCRM 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PWZ | VCRM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $509 | $220 | $289 |
| 20 | $1,976 | $859 | $1,117 |
| 30 | $5,755 | $2,520 | $3,235 |
- 0.28%PWZ
- 0.12%VCRM, cheaper
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
VCRM 8th cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ 24th cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ vs VCRM Dividends
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- VCRM 3.81%
- PWZ $0.92
- VCRM $2.82
- PWZ $0.08
- VCRM $0.21
- PWZ Oct 19, 2026
- VCRM Oct 1, 2026
- PWZ Oct 23, 2026
- VCRM Oct 5, 2026
- PWZ Monthly
- VCRM Monthly
Distribution history
PWZ vs VCRM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PWZ 8.2%VCRM 5.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- PWZ 0.01VCRM −0.32
- Worst fall
- PWZ −17.1%VCRM −6.3%
- Market sensitivity
- PWZ 1.26VCRM 0.17
PWZ and VCRM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
