MUB ranks 2nd and PWZ 22nd of 63 funds in the Other Municipal Bond Category.
MUB vs PWZ
MUB −0.23pt a year
0.05%0.28%
MUB 11.9×the volume
9.29M782K
MUB +0.3pt
+1.8%+1.5%
MUB vs PWZ Performance
+3.2%−2.4%
- MUB 0.05%, better
- PWZ 0.28%
- MUB $54.4B
- PWZ $1.23B
- MUB +0.1%, better
- PWZ −1.2%
- MUB 3.28%
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- MUB 7950
- PWZ 1302
- MUB 9.29M sh, better
- PWZ 782K sh
- MUB $103.96
- PWZ $23.03
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MUB | PWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A95Higher | B60 |
| Mission | A100Higher | A92 |
| Risk | B65Higher | D35 |
| Tradability | B69Higher | C53 |
| Holdings | A82Higher | A73 |
| Durability | A93Higher | A81 |
Rank among Other Municipal Bond funds
Same Category. MUB and PWZ are both graded against the same 63 Other Municipal Bond funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MUBA
PWZB
In short
MUB Municipal bonds, indexed and cheap. Since 2007, MUB has packaged investment-grade national munis into tax-exempt monthly income for five basis points a year, and it sits among the deepest pools in the muni-ETF aisle.
PWZ A California-only muni ETF that has been running since 2007 and leans long: its index targets longer-dated, core-plus California bonds, federally tax-exempt, AMT-free, with cash paid out monthly.
Stated mandate
MUB The fund seeks to track an index of investment-grade U.S. municipal bonds, providing diversified exposure to the national municipal-bond market and tax-exempt income.
PWZ The fund is designed around the ICE BofAML California Long-Term Core Plus Municipal Securities Index and generally invests at least 80% of assets in index municipal securities that are federally tax-exempt.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MUB vs PWZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MUB vs PWZ Cost
Overpaying PWZ vs MUB
$4,695
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MUB 0.05%
$1,060
PWZ 0.28%
$5,755
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MUB | PWZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $92 | $509 | $417 |
| 20 | $360 | $1,976 | $1,616 |
| 30 | $1,060 | $5,755 | $4,695 |
- 0.05%MUB, cheaper
- 0.28%PWZ
- Middle half of Other Municipal Bond funds
- Median 0.30%
MUB 3rd cheapest of 63 funds
PWZ 24th cheapest of 63 funds
MUB vs PWZ Dividends
- MUB 3.28%
- PWZ 3.97%, better
- MUB $3.42
- PWZ $0.92
- MUB $0.28
- PWZ $0.08
- MUB Oct 1, 2026
- PWZ Oct 19, 2026
- MUB Oct 6, 2026
- PWZ Oct 23, 2026
- MUB Monthly
- PWZ Monthly
Distribution history
MUB vs PWZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MUB
- PWZ
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MUB 5.7%, betterPWZ 8.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- MUB −0.03PWZ 0.01, better
- Worst fall
- MUB −11.6%, betterPWZ −17.1%
- Market sensitivity
- MUB 0.90PWZ 1.26
MUB and PWZ in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.05% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.28% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.





