TSDD ranks 2nd and QBTZ 34th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
QBTZ vs TSDD
TSDD −1.33pt a year
2.31%0.98%
TSDD 23.8×the volume
425K10.1M
QBTZ vs TSDD Performance
−88.9%−27.6%
- QBTZ 2.31%
- TSDD 0.98%, better
- QBTZ $3M
- TSDD $37M
- QBTZ −88.9%
- TSDD −27.6%, better
- QBTZ
- TSDD 9.91%
- QBTZ 3
- TSDD 1
- QBTZ 425K sh
- TSDD 10.1M sh, better
- QBTZ $29.06
- TSDD $7.38
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QBTZ | TSDD |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F0 | A94Higher |
| Mission | A99Higher | A98 |
| Risk | D29 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | A80Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D36 | A72Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. QBTZ and TSDD are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QBTZD
TSDDA
In short
QBTZ The first 2X short ETF on D-Wave Quantum. QBTZ aims to deliver -200% of QBTS's move for one trading day at a time, then resets, so it is a trading tool rather than a long-haul quantum bet.
TSDD Tesla bears pick their dosage; this is the double. TSDD aims for -2x TSLA's move each day, reset daily, at 0.95% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026. Designed as a short-term tool, not a buy-and-forget holding.
Stated mandate
QBTZ QBTZ seeks daily inverse results equal to -200% of the daily percentage change in D-Wave Quantum Inc.'s share price. It is designed for short-term use and does not target results over periods longer than one trading day.
TSDD The fund seeks daily results before fees and expenses equal to negative 200% of the daily percentage change in Tesla's common stock. It is designed as a short-term inverse leveraged vehicle.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QBTZ vs TSDD Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QBTZ vs TSDD Cost
Overpaying QBTZ vs TSDD
$18,210
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QBTZ 2.31%
$36,572
TSDD 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QBTZ | TSDD | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $3,857 | $1,729 | $2,128 |
| 20 | $13,687 | $6,504 | $7,183 |
| 30 | $36,572 | $18,362 | $18,210 |
- 2.31%QBTZ
- 0.98%TSDD, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
TSDD 5th cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ 43rd cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ vs TSDD Dividends
- QBTZ
- TSDD 9.91%
- QBTZ None
- TSDD $0.65
- QBTZ
- TSDD $0.65
- QBTZ
- TSDD Dec 29, 2025
- QBTZ
- TSDD Dec 31, 2025
- QBTZ
- TSDD Irregular
Distribution history
QBTZ vs TSDD Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QBTZ 204.4%TSDD 100.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QBTZ 0.36TSDD −0.87
- Worst fall
- QBTZ −96.6%TSDD −99.1%
- Market sensitivity
- QBTZ −8.19TSDD −2.40
Popular comparisons
- 2.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 1.02%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.