AMZD ranks 4th and QBTZ 34th of 43 funds in the Single-Stock Inverse Category.
AMZD vs QBTZ
AMZD −1.29pt a year
1.02%2.31%
AMZD 28.9×the volume
12.3M425K
AMZD vs QBTZ Performance
−13.5%−88.9%
- AMZD 1.02%, better
- QBTZ 2.31%
- AMZD $16M
- QBTZ $3M
- AMZD −13.5%, better
- QBTZ −88.9%
- AMZD 2.96%
- QBTZ
- AMZD 3
- QBTZ 3
- AMZD 12.3M sh, better
- QBTZ 425K sh
- AMZD $8.34
- QBTZ $29.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AMZD | QBTZ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | F0 |
| Mission | A98 | A99Higher |
| Risk | B68Higher | D29 |
| Tradability | A73Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | A71Higher | D36 |
Rank among Single-Stock Inverse funds
Same Category. AMZD and QBTZ are both graded against the same 43 Single-Stock Inverse funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AMZDA
QBTZD
In short
AMZD Most single-stock bear funds reach for leverage. AMZD skips it: one dollar down for every dollar Amazon rises, for a single trading day, through swaps you buy like any share. 1.02% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
QBTZ The first 2X short ETF on D-Wave Quantum. QBTZ aims to deliver -200% of QBTS's move for one trading day at a time, then resets, so it is a trading tool rather than a long-haul quantum bet.
Stated mandate
AMZD The fund seeks daily inverse investment results tied to AMZN and is materially different from ordinary exchange-traded funds.
QBTZ QBTZ seeks daily inverse results equal to -200% of the daily percentage change in D-Wave Quantum Inc.'s share price. It is designed for short-term use and does not target results over periods longer than one trading day.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AMZD vs QBTZ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AMZD vs QBTZ Cost
Overpaying QBTZ vs AMZD
$17,560
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AMZD 1.02%
$19,012
QBTZ 2.31%
$36,572
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AMZD | QBTZ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,797 | $3,857 | $2,060 |
| 20 | $6,746 | $13,687 | $6,941 |
| 30 | $19,012 | $36,572 | $17,560 |
- 1.02%AMZD, cheaper
- 2.31%QBTZ
- Middle half of Single-Stock Inverse funds
- Median 1.05%
AMZD 12th cheapest of 43 funds
QBTZ 43rd cheapest of 43 funds
AMZD vs QBTZ Dividends
- AMZD 2.96%
- QBTZ
- AMZD $0.24
- QBTZ None
- AMZD $0.05
- QBTZ
- AMZD Sep 22, 2026
- QBTZ
- AMZD Sep 29, 2026
- QBTZ
- AMZD Quarterly
- QBTZ
Distribution history
AMZD vs QBTZ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AMZD 27.4%QBTZ 204.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- AMZD −0.86QBTZ 0.36
- Worst fall
- AMZD −74.7%QBTZ −96.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AMZD −1.36QBTZ −8.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.02% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.96%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.98%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.02% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 2.31% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.