Skip to content
etf.net

QCJA vs QJL

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January

QCJACCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

QJLCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QJL −0.60pt a year

QCJA0.90%QJL0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

QCJA 20.3×the volume

QCJA21.9KQJL1.08K

QCJA vs QJL Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−1.8%QCJA−5.2%QJL

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. QCJA −1.8%. QJL −5.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%0%2%4%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
QCJA 0.90%
QJL 0.30%, better
Fund size
QCJA $77M
QJL $1M
1Y total return
QCJA +6.6%
QJL No data
Holdings
QCJA 3
QJL 4
Avg volume (30D)
QCJA 21.9K sh, better
QJL 1.08K sh
NAV per share
QCJA $23.75
QJL $24.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QCJA: Cost 5, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 73, Holdings not scored, Durability 68. QJL: Cost 87, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings not scored, Durability 9.
Pillar letters and Scores for QCJA, QJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQCJAQJL
Cost30% weightF5A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA77HigherF24
Tradability15% weightA73HigherF14
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB68HigherF9

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QCJA and QJL are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QCJA ranks 7th and QJL 8th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 6CNJUNInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46
  2. Rank 7CQCJAFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 42
  3. Rank 8CQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 8CQJNCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

QCJA vs QJL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QCJA vs QJL Cost

Overpaying QCJA vs QJL

$10,891

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QCJA 0.90%

    $17,040

  • QJL 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QCJA 0.90%
  • QJL 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QCJA $17,040QJL $6,149

Year by year

YearQCJAQJLOverpaying
10$1,593$545$1,048
20$6,015$2,113$3,902
30$17,040$6,149$10,891

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%QCJA
  • 0.30%QJL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QJL cheapest of 15 funds

QCJA 13th cheapest of 15 funds

QCJA vs QJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
QCJA None
QJL None

Distribution history

QCJAAll QCJA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QJLAll QJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QCJA vs QJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QCJA 7.0%since Feb 2025QJL No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QCJA 0.88since Feb 2025QJL No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QCJA −10.7%since Jan 2025QJL No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QCJA 0.53QJL 1.34

Popular comparisons

  • QCJACvsQBQFB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QCJACvsNOCTC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QCJACvsNJANC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsNJANC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.