Skip to content
etf.net

QBQF vs QCJA

AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

QBQFBCboe

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January

QCJACCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QBQF −0.16pt a year

QBQF0.74%QCJA0.90%

Avg volume · 30D

QCJA 5.6×the volume

QBQF3.89KQCJA21.9K

QBQF vs QCJA Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−3.5%QBQF−1.8%QCJA

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. QBQF −3.5%. QCJA −1.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−1%0%1%2%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
QBQF 0.74%, better
QCJA 0.90%
Fund size
QBQF $13M
QCJA $77M
1Y total return
QBQF No data
QCJA +6.6%
Holdings
QBQF 3
QCJA 3
Avg volume (30D)
QBQF 3.89K sh
QCJA 21.9K sh, better
NAV per share
QBQF $25.70
QCJA $23.75
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QBQF: Cost 68, Risk 66, Mission not scored, Tradability 33, Holdings 100, Durability 32. QCJA: Cost 5, Risk 77, Mission not scored, Tradability 73, Holdings not scored, Durability 68.
Pillar letters and Scores for QBQF, QCJA, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQBQFQCJA
Cost30% weightB68HigherF5
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB66A77Higher
Tradability15% weightD33A73Higher
Holdings10% weightA100Not scored
Durability5% weightD32B68Higher

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QBQF and QCJA are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QBQF ranks 1st and QCJA 7th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 56
  2. Rank 2CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  3. Rank 6CNJUNInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - JuneScore 46
  4. Rank 7CQCJAFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 42
  5. Rank 8CQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40

QBQF vs QCJA Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QBQF vs QCJA Cost

Overpaying QCJA vs QBQF

$2,733

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QBQF 0.74%

    $14,307

  • QCJA 0.90%

    $17,040

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QBQF 0.74%
  • QCJA 0.90%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QCJA $17,040QBQF $14,307

Year by year

YearQBQFQCJAOverpaying
10$1,319$1,593$274
20$5,015$6,015$1,000
30$14,307$17,040$2,733

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%QBQF, cheaper
  • 0.90%QCJA
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QBQF 7th cheapest of 15 funds

QCJA 13th cheapest of 15 funds

QBQF vs QCJA Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
QBQF None
QCJA None

Distribution history

QBQFAll QBQF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QCJAAll QCJA payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QBQF vs QCJA Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QBQF No dataQCJA 7.0%since Feb 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QBQF No dataQCJA 0.88since Feb 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QBQF No dataQCJA −10.7%since Jan 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QBQF 0.19QCJA 0.53

Popular comparisons

  • QBQFBvsNOCTC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QCJACvsNOCTC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNJANC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QCJACvsNJANC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QBQFBvsNJULC

    AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QCJACvsNJULC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - January · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.