Skip to content
etf.net

NJAN vs QJL

Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

NJANCCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

QJLCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QJL −0.49pt a year

NJAN0.79%QJL0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

NJAN 13.3×the volume

NJAN14.4KQJL1.08K

NJAN vs QJL Performance

Aug 5, 2026 – Nov 5, 2026

−2.5%NJAN−5.2%QJL

Aug 5, 2026 to Nov 5, 2026. NJAN −2.5%. QJL −5.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%0%2%4%Aug 2026Sep 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
NJAN 0.79%
QJL 0.30%, better
Fund size
NJAN $331M
QJL $1M
1Y total return
NJAN +7.4%
QJL No data
Holdings
NJAN 3
QJL 4
Avg volume (30D)
NJAN 14.4K sh, better
QJL 1.08K sh
NAV per share
NJAN $59.99
QJL $24.74
52W range

ETF.net Grade

NJAN: Cost 39, Risk 50, Mission not scored, Tradability 79, Holdings not scored, Durability 87. QJL: Cost 87, Risk 24, Mission not scored, Tradability 14, Holdings not scored, Durability 9.
Pillar letters and Scores for NJAN, QJL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarNJANQJL
Cost30% weightD39A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC50HigherF24
Tradability15% weightA79HigherF14
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightA87HigherF9

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. NJAN and QJL are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

NJAN ranks 3rd and QJL 8th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 1BQBQFAllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETFScore 56
  2. Rank 2CNOCTInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 55
  3. Rank 3CNJANInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 4CNJULInnovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - JulyScore 53
  5. Rank 7CQCJAFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Conservative Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 42
  6. Rank 8CQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  7. Rank 8CQJNCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

NJANCInnovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

QJLCCorgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

In short

NJAN The January rung of Innovator's Nasdaq-100 ladder: hold a QQQ-linked stake, hand back the upside above a cap set each January, and get the first 15% of the year's losses absorbed. Big tech with the top and bottom sanded down.

QJL No data

Stated mandate

NJAN The fund seeks capped upside exposure to the Invesco QQQ Trust while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period.

QJL No data

Why people hold it

  • NJAN Deep cushion by design: the first 15% of the reference asset's losses over each roughly one-year outcome period are absorbed before you feel anything.
  • The reference asset is the Invesco QQQ Trust itself, not a bespoke index. What you're buffering is the same Nasdaq-100 exposure most investors already know.
  • Part of a dated series (NAPR, NJUL run the same 15% Power Buffer on different start months), so entry dates can be laddered rather than bet on one January.
  • Fee sits right at the middle of the Nasdaq-100 buffer aisle at 0.79%, and the fund has been running its annual reset since 2020.

QJL No data

Worth knowing

  • NJAN The cap is the price of the buffer. It's reset each January from options pricing, so a scorching Nasdaq-100 year gets left partly on the table.
  • Outcomes are engineered start-to-finish of the period. Buy or sell mid-period and your real cushion and remaining upside differ from the headline terms.
  • Cheaper ways to buffer the Nasdaq-100 exist (PBQQ runs 0.50%), and this one trades lightly, so limit orders matter more here than with the category's giants.

QJL No data

Full NJAN profile⁠

Full QJL profile⁠

NJAN vs QJL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

NJAN vs QJL Cost

Overpaying NJAN vs QJL

$9,025

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • NJAN 0.79%

    $15,174

  • QJL 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • NJAN 0.79%
  • QJL 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530NJAN $15,174QJL $6,149

Year by year

YearNJANQJLOverpaying
10$1,405$545$860
20$5,331$2,113$3,218
30$15,174$6,149$9,025

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%NJAN
  • 0.30%QJL, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QJL cheapest of 15 funds

NJAN 8th cheapest of 15 funds

NJAN vs QJL Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Payout (12M)
NJAN None
QJL None

Distribution history

NJANAll NJAN payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QJLAll QJL payments⁠

No distribution history available.

NJAN vs QJL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
NJAN 7.1%QJL No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
NJAN 1.20QJL No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
NJAN −20.7%QJL No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
NJAN 0.44QJL 1.34

NJAN and QJL in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • NJANCvsQBQFB

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJANCvsNOCTC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • NJANCvsNJULC

    Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QJLCvsNJULC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - July

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.