PANG ranks 3rd and QCMU 78th of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
PANG vs QCMU
PANG −0.31pt a year
0.76%1.07%
QCMU 3.1×the volume
44.6K137K
PANG vs QCMU Performance
+76.3%−44.8%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- QCMU 1.07%
- PANG $9M
- QCMU $19M
- PANG +76.3%, better
- QCMU −44.8%
- PANG
- QCMU 3.52%
- PANG 4
- QCMU 7
- PANG 44.6K sh
- QCMU 137K sh, better
- PANG $31.31
- QCMU $17.51
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | PANG | QCMU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A70Higher | C40 |
| Mission | A94Higher | B67 |
| Risk | A74Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B60 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B59 | A73Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. PANG and QCMU are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
PANGA
QCMUC
In short
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
QCMU Qualcomm's daily move, doubled. Direxion packages 200% daily exposure to QCOM through swaps, with a matching bear fund for the other side of the trade. The leverage resets every day, which makes it a short-horizon tool by design.
Stated mandate
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
QCMU The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the performance of QUALCOMM Incorporated common shares before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
PANG vs QCMU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
PANG vs QCMU Cost
Overpaying QCMU vs PANG
$5,159
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
QCMU 1.07%
$19,815
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | PANG | QCMU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,353 | $1,881 | $528 |
| 20 | $5,142 | $7,046 | $1,904 |
| 30 | $14,656 | $19,815 | $5,159 |
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- 1.07%QCMU
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
QCMU 213th cheapest of 315 funds
PANG vs QCMU Dividends
- PANG
- QCMU 3.52%
- PANG
- QCMU $0.59
- PANG $1.30
- QCMU $0.14
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- QCMU Sep 22, 2026
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- QCMU Sep 29, 2026
- PANG Irregular
- QCMU Quarterly
Distribution history
PANG vs QCMU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- PANG 128.2%QCMU 131.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- PANG 0.90QCMU 0.30
- Worst fall
- PANG −62.4%QCMU −68.7%
- Market sensitivity
- PANG 3.32QCMU 8.91
PANG and QCMU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.07% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
