Skip to content

QDEC vs QTR

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - December

QDECCCboe

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

Expense ratio

QTR −0.65pt a year

QDEC0.90%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

QDEC 19.4×the volume

QDEC32.4KQTR1.67K

5Y return · a year

Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.

QDEC+9.4%QTR+9.4%

QDEC vs QTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+57.0%QDEC+56.8%QTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QDEC +57.0%. QTR +56.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QDEC 0.90%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
QDEC $693M
QTR $10M
1Y total return
QDEC +13.0%, better
QTR +4.6%
Yield (12M)
QDEC No data
QTR 17.33%
Holdings
QDEC 3
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
QDEC 32.4K sh, better
QTR 1.67K sh
NAV per share
QDEC $35.88
QTR $32.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QDEC: Cost 15, Risk 47, Mission not scored, Tradability 84, Holdings 49, Durability 84. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 85, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for QDEC, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQDECQTR
Cost30% weightF15A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC47HigherF14
Tradability15% weightA84HigherD32
Holdings10% weightC49A85Higher
Durability5% weightA84HigherD38

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QDEC and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

QTR ranks 2nd and QDEC 8th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61
  5. Rank 7CQMARFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - MarchScore 46
  6. Rank 8CQDECFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - DecemberScore 44
  7. Rank 9CQJUNFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - JuneScore 43

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QDECCFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - December

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

QDEC December's rung on First Trust's ladder of Nasdaq-100 buffer funds. It absorbs the first 10% of a decline over each one-year outcome period, in exchange for giving up gains above a cap that resets every December.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

QDEC The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, before fees and expenses, subject to an 18.22% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • QDEC The deal is written down in advance: first 10% of a Nasdaq-100 decline absorbed, upside capped, over a one-year outcome period that resets each December.ftportfolios.com
  • One of several First Trust Nasdaq-100 buffers on staggered reset months (QMAR, QJUN, QSPT), so the start date is a choice rather than whatever month you showed up.
  • Running since December 2020 with multiple complete outcome periods behind it, and a few hundred million dollars in assets. Not a launch-year experiment.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • QDEC At 0.90% it sits above the buffer-cohort median, and cheaper Nasdaq-100 buffers exist: QBUF at 0.79%, PGIM's series at 0.50%, QTR at 0.25%.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's biggest names, so the bid-ask spread is part of the cost, especially on larger orders.
  • Buffer and cap apply before fees and run December to December. Buy mid-period and your own protection and ceiling differ from the stated terms.ftportfolios.com
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full QDEC profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

QDEC vs QTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QDEC vs QTR Cost

Overpaying QDEC vs QTR

$11,881

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QDEC 0.90%

    $17,040

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QDEC 0.90%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QDEC $17,040QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearQDECQTROverpaying
10$1,593$455$1,138
20$6,015$1,769$4,246
30$17,040$5,159$11,881

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%QDEC
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

QDEC 9th cheapest of 12 funds

QDEC vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QDEC No data
QTR 17.33%
Payout (12M)
QDEC None
QTR $5.67
Last payment
QDEC No data
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
QDEC No data
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
QDEC No data
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
QDEC No data
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

QDECAll QDEC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

QDEC vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QDEC
  • QTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QTR −31.7% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QDEC 9.1%, betterQTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QDEC 1.23, betterQTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QDEC −25.3%, betterQTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QDEC 0.59QTR 1.16

QDEC and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QDECCvsPQAPB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - December · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQAPB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDECCvsPQJAB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - December · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QDECCvsPQOCB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - December · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.