QTR ranks 2nd and QDEC 8th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.
QDEC vs QTR
QTR −0.65pt a year
0.90%0.25%
QDEC 19.4×the volume
32.4K1.67K
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+9.4%+9.4%
QDEC vs QTR Performance
+57.0%+56.8%
- QDEC 0.90%
- QTR 0.25%, better
- QDEC $693M
- QTR $10M
- QDEC +13.0%, better
- QTR +4.6%
- QDEC
- QTR 17.33%
- QDEC 3
- QTR 105
- QDEC 32.4K sh, better
- QTR 1.67K sh
- QDEC $35.88
- QTR $32.70
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QDEC | QTR |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F15 | A97Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C47Higher | F14 |
| Tradability | A84Higher | D32 |
| Holdings | C49 | A85Higher |
| Durability | A84Higher | D38 |
Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. QDEC and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QDECC
QTRB
In short
QDEC December's rung on First Trust's ladder of Nasdaq-100 buffer funds. It absorbs the first 10% of a decline over each one-year outcome period, in exchange for giving up gains above a cap that resets every December.
QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.
Stated mandate
QDEC The Fund seeks to match the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, before fees and expenses, subject to an 18.22% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.
QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QDEC vs QTR Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QDEC vs QTR Cost
Overpaying QDEC vs QTR
$11,881
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QDEC 0.90%
$17,040
QTR 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QDEC | QTR | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,593 | $455 | $1,138 |
| 20 | $6,015 | $1,769 | $4,246 |
| 30 | $17,040 | $5,159 | $11,881 |
- 0.90%QDEC
- 0.25%QTR, cheaper
- Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
QTR cheapest of 12 funds
QDEC 9th cheapest of 12 funds
QDEC vs QTR Dividends
- QDEC
- QTR 17.33%
- QDEC None
- QTR $5.67
- QDEC
- QTR $0.04
- QDEC
- QTR Jun 29, 2026
- QDEC
- QTR Jul 2, 2026
- QDEC
- QTR Twice a year
Distribution history
QDEC vs QTR Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QDEC
- QTR
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QDEC 9.1%, betterQTR 16.7%
- Return per unit of risk
- QDEC 1.23, betterQTR 0.91
- Worst fall
- QDEC −25.3%, betterQTR −31.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QDEC 0.59QTR 1.16
QDEC and QTR in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.90% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.90% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
