QFF vs QLTY: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

Qualivian Focus Fund ETF

QFFBNasdaq

GMO US Quality ETF

QLTYANYSE Arca

Overlap

36.4%by weight

Expense ratio

QFF0.50%QLTY0.50%

Avg volume · 30D

QLTY 10.2×the volume

QFF39.5KQLTY402K

QFF vs QLTY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−4.0%QFF+4.4%QLTY

Expense ratio: QFF 0.50%; QLTY 0.50%
Fund size: QFF $55M; QLTY $5.4B
1Y total return: QFF No data; QLTY +17.4%
Yield (12M): QFF No data; QLTY 0.65%
Holdings: QFF 21; QLTY 47
Avg volume (30D): QFF 39.5K sh; QLTY 402K sh, better
NAV per share: QFF $23.71; QLTY $43.53
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for QFF, QLTY, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	QFF	QLTY
Cost30% weight	A75	A75
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A77
Risk15% weight	C40	B68Higher
Tradability15% weight	B66	A80Higher
Holdings10% weight	D32	A75Higher
Durability5% weight	C43	A89Higher

Rank among US Active Quality funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. QFF and QLTY are both graded against the same 16 US Active Quality funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

US Active Quality⁠

Category · 16 funds

See all 16 ›

QLTY ranks 2nd and QFF 5th of 16 funds in the US Active Quality Category.

Rank 1ANPFENpf Core Equity EtfScore 79
Rank 2AQLTYGMO US Quality ETFScore 75
Rank 3BAQECAQE Core ETFScore 66
Rank 4BQIDXIndexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETFScore 64
Rank 5BQFFQualivian Focus Fund ETFScore 58
Rank 6BABIGArgent Large Cap ETFScore 56

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QFFBQualivian Focus Fund ETF

QLTYAGMO US Quality ETF

In short

QFF No data

QLTY Most quality ETFs run a rules screen. QLTY hands the job to GMO's stock pickers, who buy US companies they judge high quality and chase plain total return. Active conviction, priced like it: 0.50% a year.

Stated mandate

QFF No data

QLTY The Fund seeks total return. It is actively managed and invests primarily in equities of U.S. companies that GMO believes are high quality.

Why people hold it

QFF No data

QLTY Actively managed, not index-tracking. GMO's team chooses the US companies it considers high quality, under a straightforward total-return mandate instead of a published factor formula.
GMO's read on quality leans toward wide moats and free cash flow, so the lineup can look meaningfully different from the index-built quality funds it sits beside.
Opened in 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund with moderate daily trading and a quarterly distribution schedule.
The filings match the label: a standard 1940-Act fund holding US equities, screened on quality, no derivative wrapper or offshore complexity.

Worth knowing

QFF No data

QLTY The 0.50% fee runs above the typical quality-cohort charge, and index-built rivals undercut it hard: QUAL at 0.15%, JQUA at 0.12%.
No index to fall back on. Everything rides on GMO's stock selection, and the ETF's own record only starts in 2023.
Mostly on that fee, it sits in the lower half of its US quality peer group even though it does the job its documents describe.

Full QFF profile⁠

Full QLTY profile⁠

QFF vs QLTY Holdings

How QFF and QLTY differ

Overlap by weight

36.4%

Shared holdings make up 63.6% of QFF and 39.2% of QLTY.

Level by level

Holdings12 in both36.4%
Asset classEquity100%
Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for QFF.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in QFF and QLTY, widest gap first
Country	More in QFFMore in QLTY	QFF	QLTY
United States	Same weight	100.0%	100.0%

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

QFF63.9%
QLTY43.4%

Securities held

QFF21
QLTY46

Asset class

QFF: Equity
QLTY: Equity

Holdings

Only in QFF9
In both12
Only in QLTY34

Only in QFF

9 securities, 36.4% of QFF by weight

Berkshire Hathaway Inc9.31%
Casey's General Stores Inc4.91%
Amphenol Corp4.64%
Micron Technology Inc4.62%
O'Reilly Automotive Inc4.31%
Cboe Global Markets Inc3.57%
Marriott International Inc/MD3.30%
Vertiv Holdings Co1.30%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.47%

Only in QLTY

34 securities, 60.8% of QLTY by weight

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc4.38%
Apple Inc4.38%
Texas Instruments Inc3.96%
Lam Research Corp3.17%
Eli Lilly & Co2.93%
UnitedHealth Group Inc2.61%
Abbott Laboratories2.38%
Kla Corp2.25%
Netflix Inc2.16%
Salesforce Inc2.07%
Procter & Gamble Co/The2.07%
Aramark1.97%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings In1.88%
Us Bancorp1.77%
Synopsys Inc1.76%
Coca Cola Co/The1.71%
Accenture PLC Class A1.63%
The Cigna Group1.60%
Merck & Co. Inc.1.56%
Elevance Health Inc1.52%
Constellation Brands Inc A1.35%
Intuitive Surgical Inc1.23%
Roper Technologies Inc1.17%
Philip Morris International1.07%
Tradeweb Markets Inc Class A1.06%
Quest Diagnostics Inc1.04%
Martin Marietta Materials1.03%
Home Depot Inc0.89%
Stryker Corp0.88%
Brown Forman Corp Class B0.82%
Moody’s Corp0.74%
Jack Henry & Associates Inc0.65%
State Str Instl Invt Tr0.56%
Ferguson Enterprises Inc0.53%

Weight gaps

All 12 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.

Holding weights in QFF and QLTY, widest gap first
Holding	More in QFFMore in QLTY	QFF	QLTY
NVIDIA CorpNVDA	QFF +6.15 points	9.05%	2.90%
Visa IncV	QFF +4.40 points	6.81%	2.41%
Mastercard IncMA	QFF +3.79 points	6.19%	2.40%
TJX Cos Inc/TheTJX	QFF +3.51 points	4.76%	1.25%
Amazon.com IncAMZN	QFF +2.54 points	6.10%	3.56%
Uber Technologies IncUBER	QFF +2.54 points	3.62%	1.08%
Microsoft CorpMSFT	QLTY +2.15 points	5.81%	7.96%
Ge AerospaceGE	QFF +1.83 points	3.46%	1.63%
Alphabet IncGOOGL	QFF +1.82 points	6.01%	4.19%
Meta Platforms IncMETA	QLTY +0.64 points	3.37%	4.01%
Johnson & JohnsonJNJ	QFF +0.54 points	4.98%	4.44%
Broadcom IncAVGO	QFF +0.04 points	3.44%	3.40%

All QFF holdings⁠All QLTY holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QFF vs QLTY Cost

Same expense ratio

$9,979

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

QFF 0.50%
$9,979
QLTY 0.50%
$9,979

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

QFF 0.50%
QLTY 0.50%

Year by year

Year	QFF	QLTY
10	$900	$900
20	$3,460	$3,460
30	$9,979	$9,979

Expense ratio

0.50%QFF
0.50%QLTY

QFF0.50%QLTY0.50%

0.40%1.52%

Middle half of US Active Quality funds
Median 0.65%

QFF 4th cheapest of 16 funds

QLTY 4th cheapest of 16 funds

QFF vs QLTY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026

Yield (12M): QFF No data; QLTY 0.65%
Payout (12M): QFF None; QLTY $0.28
Last payment: QFF No data; QLTY $0.06
Ex-dividend: QFF No data; QLTY Sep 30, 2026
Paid on: QFF No data; QLTY Oct 1, 2026
Frequency: QFF No data; QLTY Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

QFFAll QFF payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QLTYQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll QLTY payments⁠

QFF vs QLTY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: QFF No dataQLTY 11.9%since Dec 2023
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: QFF No dataQLTY 1.27since Dec 2023
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: QFF No dataQLTY −17.0%since Nov 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: QFF 0.94QLTY 0.98; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

QFFBvsNPFEA
Qualivian Focus Fund ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.40%
Category
QLTYAvsNPFEA
GMO US Quality ETF · Npf Core Equity Etf
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.40%
Category
QFFBvsAQECB
Qualivian Focus Fund ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.49%
Category
QLTYAvsAQECB
GMO US Quality ETF · AQE Core ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.49%
Category
QFFBvsQIDXB
Qualivian Focus Fund ETF · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category
QLTYAvsQIDXB
GMO US Quality ETF · Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF
Expense ratio
0.50% · 0.50%
Category