SCYB ranks 2nd and QHY 20th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
QHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.35pt a year
0.38%0.03%
SCYB 57.8×the volume
19.1K1.1M
Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
+7.7%+7.7%
QHY vs SCYB Performance
+2.2%+2.0%
- QHY 0.38%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- QHY $249M
- SCYB $2.8B
- QHY +2.2%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- QHY 6.42%
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- QHY 482
- SCYB 1844
- QHY 19.1K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- QHY $44.54
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A97 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B60 | B60 |
| Tradability | C54 | A81Higher |
| Holdings | B62 | A99Higher |
| Durability | B68 | B68 |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. QHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QHYA
SCYBA
In short
QHY Most high-yield ETFs buy the market and move on. QHY runs a rules-based index that screens U.S. junk-bond issuers on profitability and tilts toward value, holding roughly 500 bonds instead of a plain cap-weighted sweep.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
QHY The Fund seeks to track the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Index before fees and expenses.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying QHY vs SCYB
$7,068
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QHY 0.38%
$7,706
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $55 | $633 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $216 | $2,442 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $638 | $7,068 |
- 0.38%QHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
QHY 30th cheapest of 84 funds
QHY vs SCYB Dividends
- QHY 6.42%
- SCYB 7.82%, better
- QHY $2.86
- SCYB $1.96
- QHY $0.24
- SCYB $0.16
- QHY Oct 27, 2026
- SCYB Nov 2, 2026
- QHY Oct 29, 2026
- SCYB Pays Nov 6, 2026
- QHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
QHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QHY 5.0%SCYB 4.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QHY 0.77SCYB 0.82, better
- Worst fall
- QHY −16.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QHY 0.76SCYB 0.28
QHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
