QLV ranks 2nd and USMV 3rd of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
QLV vs USMV
QLV −0.07pt a year
0.08%0.15%
USMV 215.2×the volume
8.83K1.9M
QLV +2.7pt
+10.3%+7.6%
QLV vs USMV Performance
+63.3%+44.0%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- USMV 0.15%
- QLV $189M
- USMV $24B
- QLV +17.0%, better
- USMV +12.1%
- QLV 1.43%, better
- USMV 1.37%
- QLV 122
- USMV 177
- QLV 8.83K sh
- USMV 1.9M sh, better
- QLV $82.16
- USMV $102.90
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLV | USMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A70 |
| Mission | A76 | A83Higher |
| Risk | A86Higher | B66 |
| Tradability | B67 | A89Higher |
| Holdings | D34 | B57Higher |
| Durability | D31 | A87Higher |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. QLV and USMV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLVA
USMVA
In short
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
USMV The household name in low-volatility investing. Since 2011 USMV has tracked an MSCI index built around U.S. stocks with calmer price behavior, holding roughly 160 names for 0.15% a year.
Stated mandate
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
USMV The fund seeks to track an index targeting U.S. stocks with lower-volatility characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLV vs USMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLV vs USMV Cost
Overpaying USMV vs QLV
$1,448
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
USMV 0.15%
$3,137
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLV | USMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $274 | $127 |
| 20 | $575 | $1,071 | $496 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $3,137 | $1,448 |
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- 0.15%USMV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
USMV 5th cheapest of 16 funds
QLV vs USMV Dividends
- QLV 1.43%, better
- USMV 1.37%
- QLV $1.18
- USMV $1.41
- QLV $0.28
- USMV $0.33
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- USMV Sep 15, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- USMV Sep 18, 2026
- QLV Quarterly
- USMV Quarterly
Distribution history
QLV vs USMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLV
- USMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLV 8.6%, betterUSMV 9.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLV 1.56, betterUSMV 0.99
- Worst fall
- QLV −17.9%USMV −17.9%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- QLV 0.58USMV 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.