QLV ranks 2nd and VSMV 16th of 16 funds in the US Low Volatility Index Category.
QLV vs VSMV
QLV −0.27pt a year
0.08%0.35%
QLV 1.9×the volume
9K4.81K
VSMV +0.5pt
+10.1%+10.6%
QLV vs VSMV Performance
+61.6%+65.8%
- QLV 0.08%, better
- VSMV 0.35%
- QLV $190M
- VSMV $163M
- QLV +17.2%, better
- VSMV +17.1%
- QLV 1.43%, better
- VSMV 1.31%
- QLV 123
- VSMV 62
- QLV 9K sh, better
- VSMV 4.81K sh
- QLV $80.80
- VSMV $60.54
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLV | VSMV |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F7 |
| Mission | A77Higher | A71 |
| Risk | A79Higher | B69 |
| Tradability | B65Higher | C41 |
| Holdings | D33Higher | D26 |
| Durability | D30Higher | F18 |
Rank among US Low Volatility Index funds
Same Category. QLV and VSMV are both graded against the same 16 US Low Volatility Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLVA
VSMVD
In short
QLV Low vol with a quality gate: the index cuts the weakest-scoring fifth of US large and mid caps, then optimizes what's left for calm. Fee is 0.08% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.
VSMV Most minimum-volatility funds hand the whole market to a volatility optimizer. VSMV screens first, keeping stocks that rate well on earnings quality, momentum, profitability and valuation, then optimizes only those survivors for the smoothest ride.
Stated mandate
QLV The fund seeks to track the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index and provide exposure to U.S. companies selected for lower overall volatility and quality characteristics.
VSMV The Fund seeks to track the Nasdaq Victory US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLV vs VSMV Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLV vs VSMV Cost
Overpaying VSMV vs QLV
$5,437
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLV 0.08%
$1,689
VSMV 0.35%
$7,126
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLV | VSMV | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $147 | $634 | $487 |
| 20 | $575 | $2,454 | $1,879 |
| 30 | $1,689 | $7,126 | $5,437 |
- 0.08%QLV, cheaper
- 0.35%VSMV
- Middle half of US Low Volatility Index funds
- Median 0.20%
QLV cheapest of 16 funds
VSMV 14th cheapest of 16 funds
QLV vs VSMV Dividends
- QLV 1.43%, better
- VSMV 1.31%
- QLV $1.18
- VSMV $0.81
- QLV $0.28
- VSMV $0.03
- QLV Sep 18, 2026
- VSMV Nov 6, 2026
- QLV Sep 24, 2026
- VSMV Nov 9, 2026
- QLV Quarterly
- VSMV Monthly
Distribution history
QLV vs VSMV Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- QLV
- VSMV
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLV 8.6%, betterVSMV 9.4%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLV 1.56, betterVSMV 1.41
- Worst fall
- QLV −17.9%, betterVSMV −18.0%
- Market sensitivity
- QLV 0.58VSMV 0.56
Popular comparisons
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.08% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.35% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.