Skip to content
etf.net

QMFE vs QQMY

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February

QMFEDCboe

Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series

QQMYCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

QQMY −0.60pt a year

QMFE0.90%QQMY0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

QMFE 2.1×the volume

QMFE4.9KQQMY2.29K

QMFE vs QQMY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

+2.0%QMFE+1.6%QQMY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. QMFE +2.0%. QQMY +1.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%3%4%5%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QMFE 0.90%
QQMY 0.30%, better
Fund size
QMFE $43M
QQMY $2M
1Y total return
QMFE +12.2%
QQMY No data
Holdings
QMFE 3
QQMY 4
Avg volume (30D)
QMFE 4.9K sh, better
QQMY 2.29K sh
NAV per share
QMFE $24.63
QQMY $25.82
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QMFE: Cost 5, Risk 75, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings not scored, Durability 56. QQMY: Cost 87, Risk 57, Mission not scored, Tradability 18, Holdings not scored, Durability 21.
Pillar letters and Scores for QMFE, QQMY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQMFEQQMY
Cost30% weightF5A87Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA75HigherB57
Tradability15% weightC53HigherF18
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightB56HigherF21

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QMFE and QQMY are both graded against the same 15 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15%⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

QQMY ranks 8th and QMFE 14th of 15 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% Category.

  1. Rank 8CQQJLCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  2. Rank 8CQQMYCorgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 14DQMFEFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - FebruaryScore 36
  4. Rank 15DQMNVFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - NovemberScore 35

QMFE vs QQMY Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QMFE vs QQMY Cost

Overpaying QMFE vs QQMY

$10,891

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QMFE 0.90%

    $17,040

  • QQMY 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QMFE 0.90%
  • QQMY 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QMFE $17,040QQMY $6,149

Year by year

YearQMFEQQMYOverpaying
10$1,593$545$1,048
20$6,015$2,113$3,902
30$17,040$6,149$10,891

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%QMFE
  • 0.30%QQMY, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 15% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QQMY cheapest of 15 funds

QMFE 13th cheapest of 15 funds

QMFE vs QQMY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
QMFE None
QQMY None

Distribution history

QMFEAll QMFE payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QQMYAll QQMY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QMFE vs QQMY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QMFE 8.1%since Mar 2025QQMY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QMFE 1.21since Mar 2025QQMY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QMFE −11.8%since Feb 2025QQMY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QMFE 0.59QQMY 0.95

Popular comparisons

  • QMFEDvsQBQFB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsQBQFB

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · AllianzIM Growth 100 Buffer15 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QMFEDvsNJANC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNJANC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QMFEDvsNOCTC

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer ETF - February · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • QQMYCvsNOCTC

    Corgi Growth & Technology 15% Structured Buffer ETF - May Series · Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.79%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.