SPYG ranks 1st and QMID 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
QMID vs SPYG
SPYG −0.34pt a year
0.38%0.04%
SPYG 5750.1×the volume
3972.28M
QMID vs SPYG Performance
+8.3%+8.3%
- QMID 0.38%
- SPYG 0.04%, better
- QMID $2M
- SPYG $55.5B
- QMID +8.3%
- SPYG +8.3%
- QMID 0.48%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- QMID 125
- SPYG 154
- QMID 397 sh
- SPYG 2.28M sh, better
- QMID $30.20
- SPYG $119.59
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QMID | SPYG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B55 | A98Higher |
| Risk | B56 | B62Higher |
| Tradability | D25 | A95Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | D38 |
| Durability | D28 | A79Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. QMID and SPYG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QMIDC
SPYGA
In short
QMID Plenty of mid-cap growth funds buy growth and hope profits follow. QMID ranks mid-caps on both, blending earnings and sales growth with return on equity and assets, then keeps only the top-scoring 30% and bars real estate, utilities and banks outright.
SPYG The growth half of the S&P 500 for 0.04% a year, running since 2000. No exotic screen, no reinvention: just the index's fastest-growing names, in the cheapest wrapper tracking that index.
Stated mandate
QMID QMID seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. It uses passive indexing and generally representative sampling to pursue that objective.
SPYG The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total return of the S&P 500 Growth Index. It provides exposure to S&P 500 companies selected for strong growth characteristics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QMID vs SPYG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QMID vs SPYG Cost
Overpaying QMID vs SPYG
$6,857
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QMID 0.38%
$7,706
SPYG 0.04%
$849
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QMID | SPYG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $73 | $615 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $288 | $2,370 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $849 | $6,857 |
- 0.38%QMID
- 0.04%SPYG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
SPYG 2nd cheapest of 35 funds
QMID 26th cheapest of 35 funds
QMID vs SPYG Dividends
- QMID 0.48%
- SPYG 0.50%, better
- QMID $0.15
- SPYG $0.59
- QMID $0.15
- SPYG $0.15
- QMID Dec 26, 2025
- SPYG Sep 21, 2026
- QMID Dec 30, 2025
- SPYG Sep 23, 2026
- QMID Annual
- SPYG Quarterly
Distribution history
QMID vs SPYG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QMID 14.9%SPYG 16.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QMID 0.30SPYG 1.28
- Worst fall
- QMID −24.4%SPYG −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QMID 0.94SPYG 1.17
QMID and SPYG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.04% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

