IMCG ranks 2nd and QMID 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
IMCG vs QMID
IMCG −0.32pt a year
0.06%0.38%
IMCG 333.4×the volume
132K397
IMCG vs QMID Performance
+14.0%+8.3%
- IMCG 0.06%, better
- QMID 0.38%
- IMCG $4.04B
- QMID $2M
- IMCG +14.0%, better
- QMID +8.3%
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- QMID 0.48%
- IMCG 262
- QMID 125
- IMCG 132K sh, better
- QMID 397 sh
- IMCG $93.24
- QMID $30.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | IMCG | QMID |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A78Higher | D26 |
| Mission | A95Higher | B55 |
| Risk | A78Higher | B56 |
| Tradability | B61Higher | D25 |
| Holdings | A75Higher | A73 |
| Durability | B66Higher | D28 |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. IMCG and QMID are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
IMCGA
QMIDC
In short
IMCG Growth investing usually means megacaps. IMCG works the middle of the market instead: roughly 300 mid-cap growth names, indexed since 2004, for six basis points a year.
QMID Plenty of mid-cap growth funds buy growth and hope profits follow. QMID ranks mid-caps on both, blending earnings and sales growth with return on equity and assets, then keeps only the top-scoring 30% and bars real estate, utilities and banks outright.
Stated mandate
IMCG The Fund seeks to track an index of U.S. mid-capitalization equities with growth characteristics. Its strategy uses representative sampling and generally invests at least 80% of assets in securities from the Underlying Index.
QMID QMID seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. It uses passive indexing and generally representative sampling to pursue that objective.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
IMCG vs QMID Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
IMCG vs QMID Cost
Overpaying QMID vs IMCG
$6,436
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
IMCG 0.06%
$1,270
QMID 0.38%
$7,706
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | IMCG | QMID | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $110 | $688 | $578 |
| 20 | $432 | $2,658 | $2,226 |
| 30 | $1,270 | $7,706 | $6,436 |
- 0.06%IMCG, cheaper
- 0.38%QMID
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
IMCG 9th cheapest of 35 funds
QMID 26th cheapest of 35 funds
IMCG vs QMID Dividends
- IMCG 0.67%, better
- QMID 0.48%
- IMCG $0.62
- QMID $0.15
- IMCG $0.19
- QMID $0.15
- IMCG Sep 15, 2026
- QMID Dec 26, 2025
- IMCG Sep 18, 2026
- QMID Dec 30, 2025
- IMCG Quarterly
- QMID Annual
Distribution history
IMCG vs QMID Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- IMCG 16.6%QMID 14.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- IMCG 0.97QMID 0.30
- Worst fall
- IMCG −35.1%QMID −24.4%
- Market sensitivity
- IMCG 1.14QMID 0.94
IMCG and QMID in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.06% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

