VUG ranks 5th and QMID 32nd of 35 funds in the US Growth Index Category.
QMID vs VUG
0.2%by weight
VUG −0.35pt a year
0.38%0.03%
VUG 15925.0×the volume
3976.32M
QMID vs VUG Performance
+8.3%+2.7%
- QMID 0.38%
- VUG 0.03%, better
- QMID $2M
- VUG $392B
- QMID +8.3%, better
- VUG +2.7%
- QMID 0.48%, better
- VUG 0.41%
- QMID 125
- VUG 136
- QMID 397 sh
- VUG 6.32M sh, better
- QMID $30.20
- VUG $85.06
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QMID | VUG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A96Higher |
| Mission | B55 | A99Higher |
| Risk | B56Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | D25 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | A73Higher | D29 |
| Durability | D28 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Growth Index funds
Same Category. QMID and VUG are both graded against the same 35 US Growth Index funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QMIDC
VUGA
In short
QMID Plenty of mid-cap growth funds buy growth and hope profits follow. QMID ranks mid-caps on both, blending earnings and sales growth with return on equity and assets, then keeps only the top-scoring 30% and bars real estate, utilities and banks outright.
VUG Three basis points buys roughly 170 US large-cap growth names. Running since 2004, over $100 billion in assets, and it tracks its index about as closely as an index fund can.
Stated mandate
QMID QMID seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. It uses passive indexing and generally representative sampling to pursue that objective.
VUG The fund seeks to track a benchmark index measuring the investment return of large-capitalization growth stocks.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QMID vs VUG Holdings
How QMID and VUG differ
0.2%
Shared holdings make up 4.9% of QMID and 0.2% of VUG.
Level by level
- Holdings0.2%
- Sector50.0%
- Country99.1%
Sector
| Sector | More in QMIDMore in VUG | QMID | VUG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technology | VUG +38.6 points | 21.6% | 60.2% |
| Health Care | QMID +15.2 points | 19.4% | 4.2% |
| Industrials | QMID +13.2 points | 17.6% | 4.4% |
| Communication | VUG +10.4 points | 4.3% | 14.7% |
| Financials | QMID +9.1 points | 13.0% | 3.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | QMID +6.7 points | 16.5% | 9.8% |
| Consumer Staples | QMID +2.9 points | 4.2% | 1.3% |
| Energy | QMID +2.7 points | 3.0% | 0.3% |
| Real Estate | VUG +0.9 points | 0.0% | 0.9% |
| Materials | Same weight | 0.4% | 0.4% |
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QMIDMore in VUG | QMID | VUG |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | VUG +0.9 points | 99.1% | 100.0% |
| Brazil | QMID +0.6 points | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Switzerland | QMID +0.4 points | 0.3% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- QMID15.3%
- VUG63.1%
- QMID124
- VUG135
Asset class
- QMID
- Equity
- VUG
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QMID120
- In both4
- Only in VUG131
Only in QMID
120 securities, 95.0% of QMID by weight
- Tenet Healthcare Corp1.98%
- Permian Resources Corp1.53%
- Medpace Holdings Inc1.44%
- Exelixis Inc1.40%
- Everest Re Group Ltd1.40%
- Tyler Technologies Inc1.36%
- Nutanix Inc - A1.30%
- Toast Inc-Class A1.30%
- GoDaddy Inc - Class A1.29%
- Dynatrace Inc1.25%
- Allegion Plc1.24%
- Gartner Inc1.24%
- Ralph Lauren Corp1.21%
- Docusign Inc1.18%
- Lincoln Electric Holdings Inc1.17%
- Halozyme Therapeutics Inc1.16%
- Renaissancere Holdings Ltd1.15%
- Maplebear Inc1.15%
- Samsara Inc-Cl A1.15%
- Paycom Software Inc1.11%
- Tempur Sealy International I1.11%
- Healthsouth Corp1.10%
- Manhattan Associates Inc1.09%
- Neurocrine Biosciences Inc1.08%
- Five Below Inc1.03%
- Texas Roadhouse Inc1.03%
- lululemon athletica Inc1.03%
- SEI Investments Co1.02%
- Erie Indemnity Co1.02%
- McCormick & Co Inc/MD1.01%
- DaVita Inc.0.99%
- Penumbra Inc0.97%
- Deckers Outdoor Corp0.97%
- Mueller Industries Inc0.91%
- Coca-Cola Consolidated Inc0.91%
- Factset Research Systems Inc0.90%
- Jack Henry & Associates Inc0.90%
- Pinterest Inc- Class A0.89%
- Bentley Systems Inc-Class B0.89%
- Evercore Inc0.88%
- New York Times Co-A0.87%
- Advanced Drainage Systems Inc0.87%
- Hubspot Inc0.87%
- Crane Co0.86%
- Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Co0.85%
- BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc0.84%
- Insulet Corp0.83%
- Applied Industrial Technologies0.83%
- Ensign Group Inc/The0.83%
- Match Group Inc0.82%
Only in VUG
131 securities, 99.8% of VUG by weight
- NVIDIA Corp13.49%
- Apple Inc12.51%
- Microsoft Corp9.75%
- Alphabet Inc5.16%
- Broadcom Inc4.34%
- Amazon.com Inc4.26%
- Meta Platforms Inc4.23%
- Alphabet Inc4.09%
- Advanced Micro Devices Inc2.66%
- Tesla Inc2.65%
- Eli Lilly & Co2.60%
- Visa Inc1.59%
- Intel Corp1.45%
- Mastercard Inc1.16%
- Lam Research Corp1.11%
- Palantir Technologies Inc1.10%
- Applied Materials Inc1.10%
- Costco Wholesale Corp1.09%
- Palo Alto Networks Inc0.88%
- Netflix Inc0.78%
- Crowdstrike Holdings Inc0.71%
- KLA Corp0.70%
- Sandisk Corp0.70%
- GE Vernova Inc0.69%
- Oracle Corp0.65%
- Marvell Technology Inc0.64%
- Arista Networks Inc0.60%
- Seagate Technology Holdings PLC0.58%
- Amphenol Corp0.57%
- Welltower Inc0.46%
- General Electric Co0.45%
- Western Digital Corp0.44%
- TJX Cos Inc/The0.41%
- Boeing Co/The0.41%
- Intuitive Surgical Inc0.41%
- ServiceNow Inc0.39%
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc0.37%
- Texas Instruments Inc0.36%
- Booking Holdings Inc0.34%
- Corning Inc0.34%
- Cloudflare Inc0.33%
- Fortinet Inc0.32%
- Snowflake Inc0.32%
- Starbucks Corp0.30%
- Equinix Inc0.29%
- Quanta Services Inc0.28%
- Datadog Inc0.27%
- Cadence Design Systems Inc0.27%
- Vertiv Holdings Co0.27%
- Space Exploration Technologies Corp0.26%
Weight gaps
All 4 Holdings in both funds, largest gap first.
| Holding | More in QMIDMore in VUG | QMID | VUG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Corp -Class A | QMID +2.24 points | 2.34% | 0.10% |
| TKO Group Holdings Inc | QMID +1.08 points | 1.12% | 0.04% |
| Tradeweb Markets Inc-Class A | QMID +1.04 points | 1.09% | 0.05% |
| Symbotic Inc | QMID +0.36 points | 0.39% | 0.03% |
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QMID vs VUG Cost
Overpaying QMID vs VUG
$7,068
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QMID 0.38%
$7,706
VUG 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QMID | VUG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $688 | $55 | $633 |
| 20 | $2,658 | $216 | $2,442 |
| 30 | $7,706 | $638 | $7,068 |
- 0.38%QMID
- 0.03%VUG, cheaper
- Middle half of US Growth Index funds
- Median 0.18%
VUG cheapest of 35 funds
QMID 26th cheapest of 35 funds
QMID vs VUG Dividends
- QMID 0.48%, better
- VUG 0.41%
- QMID $0.15
- VUG $0.35
- QMID $0.15
- VUG $0.09
- QMID Dec 26, 2025
- VUG Sep 28, 2026
- QMID Dec 30, 2025
- VUG Sep 30, 2026
- QMID Annual
- VUG Quarterly
Distribution history
QMID vs VUG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QMID 14.9%VUG 17.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- QMID 0.30VUG 1.11
- Worst fall
- QMID −24.4%VUG −35.6%
- Market sensitivity
- QMID 0.94VUG 1.23
QMID and VUG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.38% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


