QQQD ranks 21st and ZSL 23rd of 53 funds in the Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) Category.
QQQD vs ZSL
QQQD −0.45pt a year
0.50%0.95%
ZSL 45.4×the volume
68.1K3.09M
QQQD vs ZSL Performance
0.0%+182.9%
- QQQD 0.50%, better
- ZSL 0.95%
- QQQD $28M
- ZSL $66M
- QQQD 0.0%
- ZSL +182.9%, better
- QQQD 3.32%
- ZSL
- QQQD 3
- ZSL 1
- QQQD 68.1K sh
- ZSL 3.09M sh, better
- QQQD $12.39
- ZSL $37.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQD | ZSL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | C50 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B67Higher | C40 |
| Tradability | C43 | B58Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | B65Higher |
Rank among Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQD and ZSL are both graded against the same 53 Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQDC
ZSLC
In short
QQQD Fading the Magnificent 7 without a leverage multiplier: QQQD aims for -100% of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index's daily move, one-for-one, at 0.50% net of a waiver through September 1, 2027.
ZSL Silver runs hot, and ZSL leans the other way. Live since 2008, it aims to deliver twice the inverse of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex's daily move, reset every day: a short-term trading tool in a corner with almost no rivals.
Stated mandate
QQQD The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 100% of the inverse performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index, before fees and expenses.
ZSL The fund seeks daily results, before fees and expenses, equal to two times the inverse of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex’s daily performance.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQD vs ZSL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQD vs ZSL Cost
Overpaying ZSL vs QQQD
$7,890
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQD 0.50%
$9,979
ZSL 0.95%
$17,869
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQD | ZSL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,678 | $778 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $6,322 | $2,862 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $17,869 | $7,890 |
- 0.50%QQQD, cheaper
- 0.95%ZSL
- Middle half of Leveraged Inverse (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QQQD cheapest of 53 funds
ZSL 6th cheapest of 53 funds
QQQD vs ZSL Dividends
- QQQD 3.32%
- ZSL
- QQQD $0.41
- ZSL None
- QQQD $0.10
- ZSL
- QQQD Sep 22, 2026
- ZSL
- QQQD Sep 29, 2026
- ZSL
- QQQD Quarterly
- ZSL
Distribution history
QQQD vs ZSL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQD 21.1%ZSL 212.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQD −1.14ZSL 0.30
- Worst fall
- QQQD −51.4%ZSL −98.9%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQD −1.35ZSL −1.90
QQQD and ZSL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.95% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
