VB ranks 2nd and QQQS 16th of 16 funds in the US Small-Cap Category.
QQQS vs VB
VB −0.17pt a year
0.20%0.03%
VB 78.9×the volume
6.22K491K
QQQS +7.5pt
+26.7%+19.2%
QQQS vs VB Performance
+22.0%+17.8%
- QQQS 0.20%
- VB 0.03%, better
- QQQS $20M
- VB $76.9B
- QQQS +22.0%, better
- VB +17.8%
- QQQS 1.89%, better
- VB 1.24%
- QQQS 203
- VB 1309
- QQQS 6.22K sh
- VB 491K sh, better
- QQQS $37.89
- VB $285.63
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQS | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C47 | A91Higher |
| Mission | A86 | |
| Risk | F15 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | C54Higher |
| Holdings | D29 | B59Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A86Higher |
Rank among US Small-Cap funds
Same Category. QQQS and VB are both graded against the same 16 US Small-Cap funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQSD
VBA
In short
QQQS Invesco's "future gen" swing: a rules-based basket of roughly 200 Nasdaq-listed innovators for 0.20% a year. Young (2022 launch), small, and lightly traded, so the order screen matters as much as the thesis.
VB Vanguard's small-cap workhorse: roughly 1,400 smaller US companies for three basis points. The CRSP index behind it shifts stocks between size bands in two half steps instead of one jump, which holds turnover down. Trading since 2004.
Stated mandate
QQQS The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Index. It invests at least 90% of total assets in securities comprising that index.
VB The fund seeks to track the CRSP US Small Cap Index, which measures the investment performance of small U.S. companies. It uses an indexing approach and generally replicates the index by holding its securities in approximately their index weights.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQS vs VB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQS vs VB Cost
Overpaying QQQS vs VB
$3,517
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQS 0.20%
$4,155
VB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQS | VB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $365 | $55 | $310 |
| 20 | $1,421 | $216 | $1,205 |
| 30 | $4,155 | $638 | $3,517 |
- 0.20%QQQS
- 0.03%VB, cheaper
- Middle half of US Small-Cap funds
- Median 0.20%
VB cheapest of 16 funds
QQQS 9th cheapest of 16 funds
QQQS vs VB Dividends
- QQQS 1.89%, better
- VB 1.24%
- QQQS $0.74
- VB $3.65
- QQQS $0.02
- VB $0.85
- QQQS Sep 21, 2026
- VB Sep 28, 2026
- QQQS Sep 25, 2026
- VB Sep 30, 2026
- QQQS Quarterly
- VB Quarterly
Distribution history
QQQS vs VB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQS 26.2%VB 16.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQS 0.87VB 0.89, better
- Worst fall
- QQQS −38.1%VB −28.0%
- Market sensitivity
- QQQS 1.58VB 1.07
QQQS and VB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.20% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.03%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.06%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.04%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.19%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.



