QQQU ranks 36th and WX 37th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QQQU vs WX
0.0%by weight
WX −0.78pt a year
0.98%0.20%
QQQU 132.5×the volume
37.8K285
QQQU vs WX Performance
+5.4%−3.2%
- QQQU 0.98%
- WX 0.20%, better
- QQQU $70M
- WX $1M
- QQQU −4.7%
- WX
- QQQU 9.56%
- WX
- QQQU 13
- WX 1
- QQQU 37.8K sh, better
- WX 285 sh
- QQQU $58.23
- WX $22.96
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QQQU | WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D29 | A100Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C45 | A71Higher |
| Tradability | B55Higher | D31 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B62Higher | F23 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QQQU and WX are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QQQUC
WXC
In short
QQQU Most leveraged funds amplify a whole index. QQQU levers seven names: it targets 200% of the Magnificent 7 basket's daily move, and Direxion runs an inverse sibling on the same index for the other side.
Stated mandate
QQQU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QQQU vs WX Holdings
How QQQU and WX differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QQQU and 0.0% of WX.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for WX.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in QQQUMore in WX | QQQU | WX |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Concentration
- QQQU95.1%
- WX198.9%
- QQQU9
- WX0
Asset class
- QQQU
- Equity
- WX
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in QQQU9
- In both0
- Only in WX0
Only in QQQU
9 securities, 46.7% of QQQU by weight
- Goldman Finl Sq Trsry Inst 5066.39%
- Microsoft Corp6.24%
- Tesla Inc6.24%
- Apple Inc6.02%
- Amazon.com Inc5.61%
- NVIDIA Corp5.47%
- Meta Platforms Inc-Class A4.97%
- Alphabet Inc-Cl A4.74%
- Goldman Sachs Fin Gov 465 Institut1.05%
Only in WX
0 securities, 0.0% of WX by weight
Weight gaps
QQQU and WX share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QQQU vs WX Cost
Overpaying QQQU vs WX
$14,207
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QQQU 0.98%
$18,362
WX 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QQQU | WX | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,729 | $365 | $1,364 |
| 20 | $6,504 | $1,421 | $5,083 |
| 30 | $18,362 | $4,155 | $14,207 |
- 0.98%QQQU
- 0.20%WX, cheaper
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
WX cheapest of 95 funds
QQQU 71st cheapest of 95 funds
QQQU vs WX Dividends
- QQQU 9.56%
- WX
- QQQU $5.37
- WX None
- QQQU $0.02
- WX
- QQQU Jun 23, 2026
- WX
- QQQU Jun 30, 2026
- WX
- QQQU Quarterly
- WX
Distribution history
QQQU vs WX Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QQQU 44.5%WX
- Return per unit of risk
- QQQU 0.89WX
- Worst fall
- QQQU −53.7%WX
- Market sensitivity
- QQQU 3.09WX 2.76
Popular comparisons
- 0.98% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.89%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.