QLD ranks 1st and QQQU 36th of 95 funds in the Leveraged Long (2x & Other) Category.
QLD vs QQQU
QLD −0.09pt a year
0.89%0.98%
QLD 109.8×the volume
4.15M37.8K
QLD vs QQQU Performance
+10.7%−4.7%
- QLD 0.89%, better
- QQQU 0.98%
- QLD $13.3B
- QQQU $70M
- QLD +10.7%, better
- QQQU −4.7%
- QLD 0.15%
- QQQU 9.56%, better
- QLD 113
- QQQU 13
- QLD 4.15M sh, better
- QQQU 37.8K sh
- QLD $82.56
- QQQU $58.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | QLD | QQQU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A72Higher | D29 |
| Mission | A95 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | A100Higher | B55 |
| Holdings | A72 | |
| Durability | A81Higher | B62 |
Rank among Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
Same Category. QLD and QQQU are both graded against the same 95 Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
QLDA
QQQUC
In short
QLD The 2x dial on the Nasdaq-100. QLD aims for twice the index's daily move, half the dose of the 3x crowd, and it has been running that playbook since 2006. The multiple resets every session.
QQQU Most leveraged funds amplify a whole index. QQQU levers seven names: it targets 200% of the Magnificent 7 basket's daily move, and Direxion runs an inverse sibling on the same index for the other side.
Stated mandate
QLD The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to twice the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index.
QQQU The fund seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the performance of the Indxx Magnificent 7 Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
QLD vs QQQU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
QLD vs QQQU Cost
Overpaying QQQU vs QLD
$1,490
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
QLD 0.89%
$16,872
QQQU 0.98%
$18,362
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | QLD | QQQU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,576 | $1,729 | $153 |
| 20 | $5,953 | $6,504 | $551 |
| 30 | $16,872 | $18,362 | $1,490 |
- 0.89%QLD, cheaper
- 0.98%QQQU
- Middle half of Leveraged Long (2x & Other) funds
- Median 0.95%
QLD 28th cheapest of 95 funds
QQQU 71st cheapest of 95 funds
QLD vs QQQU Dividends
- QLD 0.15%
- QQQU 9.56%, better
- QLD $0.12
- QQQU $5.37
- QLD $0.03
- QQQU $0.02
- QLD Sep 23, 2026
- QQQU Jun 23, 2026
- QLD Sep 29, 2026
- QQQU Jun 30, 2026
- QLD Quarterly
- QQQU Quarterly
Distribution history
QLD vs QQQU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- QLD 36.7%QQQU 44.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- QLD 1.04QQQU 0.89
- Worst fall
- QLD −63.7%QQQU −53.7%
- Market sensitivity
- QLD 2.46QQQU 3.09
QLD and QQQU in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.93%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.89% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.98% · 0.95%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
