Skip to content

QSPT vs QTR

FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September

QSPTCCboe

Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

QTRBNasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

QTR −0.65pt a year

QSPT0.90%QTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

QSPT 27.0×the volume

QSPT45.1KQTR1.67K

5Y return · a year

QSPT +1.8pt

QSPT+11.2%QTR+9.4%

QSPT vs QTR Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+70.2%QSPT+56.8%QTR

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QSPT +70.2%. QTR +56.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%40%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QSPT 0.90%
QTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
QSPT $713M
QTR $10M
1Y total return
QSPT +10.6%, better
QTR +4.6%
Yield (12M)
QSPT No data
QTR 17.33%
Holdings
QSPT 3
QTR 105
Avg volume (30D)
QSPT 45.1K sh, better
QTR 1.67K sh
NAV per share
QSPT $35.11
QTR $32.70
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QSPT: Cost 15, Risk 47, Mission 95, Tradability 85, Holdings 26, Durability 82. QTR: Cost 97, Risk 14, Mission not scored, Tradability 32, Holdings 85, Durability 38.
Pillar letters and Scores for QSPT, QTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQSPTQTR
Cost30% weightF15A97Higher
Mission25% weightA95Not scored
Risk15% weightC47HigherF14
Tradability15% weightA85HigherD32
Holdings10% weightD26A85Higher
Durability5% weightA82HigherD38

Rank among Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QSPT and QTR are both graded against the same 12 Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 12 funds
See all 12 ›

QTR ranks 2nd and QSPT 11th of 12 funds in the Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1BPQAPPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - AprilScore 66
  2. Rank 2BPQJAPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - JanuaryScore 62
  3. Rank 2BQTRGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETFScore 62
  4. Rank 4BPQOCPGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - OctoberScore 61
  5. Rank 10CDDNQInnovator Growth-100 Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETFScore 42
  6. Rank 11CQSPTFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - SeptemberScore 41
  7. Rank 12DNBFRInnovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QSPTCFT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September

QTRBGlobal X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF

In short

QSPT The September stop on First Trust's quarterly Nasdaq-100 buffer carousel: it absorbs the first 10% of a QQQ price drop over a one-year stretch, and hands back everything above a cap reset each September.

QTR QTR owns the Nasdaq-100 and buys puts 10% below the index, so it wears the first leg of a selloff and passes the deep-drop risk to the options market. Insurance you pay for, not a capped buffer.

Stated mandate

QSPT The Fund seeks to track the price return of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, subject to a 16.97% upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses during the stated outcome period.

QTR QTR seeks to buffer market selloffs through a protective-put strategy that owns Nasdaq-100 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts on the Nasdaq-100 Index. It aims to generally track the Nasdaq-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index's price and yield performance before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • QSPT The deal is written down, not implied: absorb the first 10% of QQQ's price decline over the outcome period, give up gains above a cap set at each September reset.ftportfolios.com
  • The reference asset is the QQQ ETF itself rather than a bespoke index, so the security your buffer keys off trades in public view all day.
  • Running since 2021, so it has cycled through multiple complete September-to-September outcome periods, cap resets and all.
  • QTR Protection is bought outright rather than funded by selling upside calls, so the trade-off is the running cost of the puts instead of a ceiling on gains.globalxetfs.com
  • 0.25% a year, a fraction of the going rate in its Nasdaq-100 downside-protection peer group, where 0.50% (PGIM's Buffer 12 series) to 0.79% (QBUF) is typical.
  • The puts roll on the quarterly schedule set by its index, so there is no defined outcome period to time an entry around.
  • Holds the Nasdaq-100 stocks directly, roughly 100 names, and sits among the stronger implementations in its peer group.

Worth knowing

  • QSPT 0.90% a year sits above the Nasdaq-100 buffer median of 0.79%. PGIM's PQAP and PQJA charge 0.50%, Innovator's QBUF 0.79%, for similar shallow-buffer builds.
  • Price return only. QQQ's dividends don't pass through, and the fund isn't built as an income payer.
  • Thinly traded next to the category's giants, so limit orders earn their keep. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever cap and buffer are left, not the September terms.
  • QTR The puts sit 10% out of the money. The first 10% of an index drop is fully yours; the hedge only engages past that.
  • You pay put premiums whether or not markets fall, a standing cost that weighs on results in calm and rising markets.
  • A small fund that trades thinly next to the big buffer franchises, so spreads can run wider. Limit orders help.

Full QSPT profile⁠

Full QTR profile⁠

QSPT vs QTR Holdings

As of

How QSPT and QTR differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of QSPT and 0.0% of QTR.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%

Sector

No Sector split for QSPT.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

No country split for QSPT.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • QSPT106.5%
  • QTR46.7%

Securities held

  • QSPT2
  • QTR104

Asset class

QSPT
Multi-Asset
QTR
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in QSPT2
  • In both0
  • Only in QTR104

Only in QSPT

2 securities, 100% of QSPT by weight

  • 2027-09-17 Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 C 7.2196.65%
  • 2027-09-17 Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 P 721.458.72%

Only in QTR

104 securities, 99.9% of QTR by weight

  • NVIDIA Corp8.16%
  • Apple Inc7.45%
  • Microsoft Corp6.01%

Weight gaps

QSPT and QTR share no securities.

All 4 QSPT holdings⁠All 103 QTR holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QSPT vs QTR Cost

Overpaying QSPT vs QTR

$11,881

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QSPT 0.90%

    $17,040

  • QTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QSPT 0.90%
  • QTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530QSPT $17,040QTR $5,159

Year by year

YearQSPTQTROverpaying
10$1,593$455$1,138
20$6,015$1,769$4,246
30$17,040$5,159$11,881

Expense ratio

  • 0.90%QSPT
  • 0.25%QTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of Nasdaq-100 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

QTR cheapest of 12 funds

QSPT 9th cheapest of 12 funds

QSPT vs QTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QSPT No data
QTR 17.33%
Payout (12M)
QSPT None
QTR $5.67
Last payment
QSPT No data
QTR $0.04
Ex-dividend
QSPT No data
QTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
QSPT No data
QTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
QSPT No data
QTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

QSPTAll QSPT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

QTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll QTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.49; Jun 29, 2022 $0.03; Dec 29, 2022 $0.04; Jun 29, 2023 $0.03; Dec 28, 2023 $0.11; Jun 27, 2024 $0.06; Dec 30, 2024 $0.10; Jun 27, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $5.63; Jun 29, 2026 $0.04. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

QSPT vs QTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QSPT
  • QTR
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QTR −31.7% · Dec 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QSPT 9.8%, betterQTR 16.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QSPT 1.28, betterQTR 0.91
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QSPT −22.6%, betterQTR −31.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QSPT 0.67QTR 1.16

QSPT and QTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • QSPTCvsPQAPB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQAPB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QSPTCvsPQJAB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQJAB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QSPTCvsPQOCB

    FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - September · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.90% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QTRBvsPQOCB

    Global X Nasdaq 100 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - October

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.